Politics & Policy

Getting to Yes on FIRST STEP

(File photo: Robert Galbraith/Reuters)

We have watched with interest the intense debate within the Right — much of it on these very pages — over the FIRST STEP Act. We strongly believe that the federal criminal-justice system is dysfunctional and needs reform. We are also highly aware of the threat to public safety it poses to release violent individuals back onto the streets.

In a recent issue of the magazine, we urged Congress to address the serious concerns that critics such as Senator Tom Cotton had raised with the bill — and to do so with a sense of urgency, because the bill contains much that is crucial. Now, the sponsors have agreed to an amendment from Senator Ted Cruz that would, in Cruz’s words, “exclude violent offenders from being released early.” Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell plans to hold a vote this month.

It is worth continuing to hear out the bill’s critics when the final text is released, as is always the case with complicated legislation. Indeed, Senator Cotton has already vowed to introduce his own amendments to supplement Cruz’s. But so long as the changes achieve what Cruz has promised, FIRST STEP deserves to become law. As we detailed previously, it addresses a number of serious problems in the current system.

For one thing, it reforms the practice of “stacking” gun charges, in which a person charged with multiple offenses at once is treated as if he’d been caught numerous times and failed to learn his lesson. The 2004 case of Weldon Angelos illustrated this in stark terms: He received a 55-year mandatory-minimum sentence for selling marijuana to a police informant  multiple times while carrying a gun. As the judge who regretfully sentenced him pointed out, he would have gotten less time for rape or second-degree murder. (Thanks to the immense amount of publicity the case received, however, an opaque deal was struck in 2016 to give Angelos a sentence reduction.)

Meanwhile, some prisoners are still serving drug sentences from the days when a given amount of crack was treated as the equivalent of 100 times the same amount of powder cocaine. Congress already reduced this disparity for new cases, and it is fair to apply the change retroactively as well.

The bill also expands some initiatives that aim to reduce recidivism and creates statutory prison rules that, for example, keep inmates closer to their families and ban the shackling of women during labor.

We are far more skeptical of “justice reform” than are many on the left, and even many on the right. Our sympathies lie first and foremost with the victims of crime, not with those who commit it. But FIRST STEP, with Cruz’s amendment as he has described it, focuses specifically on the aspects of the federal system that that are overly punitive, sometimes horrifyingly so. Congress should comb through the final text looking for any outstanding issues, fix them as needed, and pass it.

The Editors — The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

Most Popular

Elections

Stick a Fork in O’Rourke

If, as I wrote last week here, Joe Biden may save the Democratic party from a horrible debacle at the polls next year, Beto O’Rourke may be doing the whole process a good turn now. Biden, despite his efforts to masquerade as the vanguard of what is now called progressivism, is politically sane and, if ... Read More
Elections

In Defense of the Electoral College

Senator Elizabeth Warren has joined a growing chorus within the Democratic party in calling for the abolition of the Electoral College. Speaking at a forum in Mississippi on Monday night, Warren said that she hoped to ensure that “every vote matters” and proposed that “the way we can make that happen is ... Read More
Education

Ivy-League Schools Wither

A  number of liberal bastions are daily being hammered — especially the elite university and Silicon Valley. A Yale and a Stanford, or Facebook and Google, assume — for the most part rightly — that each is so loudly progressive that the public, federal and state regulators, and politicians would of ... Read More
National Security & Defense

In Defense of the Iraq War

Today is the 16th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, and Twitter is alive with condemnations of the conflict -- countered by precious few defenses. Yet I believed the Iraq War was just and proper in 2003, and I still believe that today. When Donald Trump condemned the war during the 2015 primary campaign and ... Read More