PC Culture

Prof: ‘Almost Completely’ Avoid ‘Judgments of Quality’ When Grading Writing

“Antiracist” grading is actually more racist than the status quo.

American University is hosting a seminar next month that will teach its faculty a new approach to grading its students’ writing — and the professor who’s teaching it believes that teachers should “dispense almost completely with judgments of quality when producing course grades.”

The seminar, titled “GRADING AIN’T JUST GRADING: RETHINKING WRITING ASSESSMENT ECOLOGIES TOWARDS ANTIRACIST ENDS” is scheduled for February 1 and will be taught by Asao Inoue, a University of Washington–Tacoma professor.

“This plenary will argue against the use of conventional standards in college courses that grade student writing by single standards,” the schedule description states. “Inoue will discuss the ways that White language supremacy is perpetuated in college classrooms despite the better intentions of faculty, particularly through the practices of grading writing.”

Presumably to gain a better understanding of what kind of “conventional standards” that Inoue had a problem with, The College Fix looked into some of his previous writing. The quotation that stuck out the most to me was from his paper titled “A Grade-less Writing Course that Focuses on Labor and Assessing,” in which Inoue makes the case that writing instructors should “calculate course grades by labor completed and dispense almost completely with judgments of quality when producing course grades.”

Like a lot of dumb ideas in academia these days, this one is obviously being carried out in the name of social justice. If you look at just the title of the seminar itself, it initially kind of sounds like it would be a great idea. “Antiracist” grading sounds fantastic! In fact, I for one love grading that isn’t racist! Who could be against that? But the truth is, like far too many ideas that come from modern social-justice circles, digging deeper will reveal that not only is it stupid, but it’s also actually quite a bit more racist than the status quo.

Let me explain. As the Fix notes, much of Inoue’s writing on the subject centers around the idea that he sees inherent racism in current grading standards because white students do better than black and Latino students do. So his argument is essentially that in order for black and Latino students to receive better grades, the grading system needs to be overhauled to eliminate nearly all considerations of “quality.” This is, on its face, inherently racially insulting because it seems to assume that black and Latino students are only capable of turning in writing that is lower in “quality” than white students’ writing. Apparently, he sees no hope for these students to actually improve the quality of their work in order to earn higher grades — no, for him, the only solution is apparently to take quality out of the equation altogether.

The truth is, the only way to avoid racism or sexism in grading is to ensure that grading is done based solely on quality. If a student writes a high-quality paper, then he gets a high grade, regardless of his race. If a student writes a low-quality paper, then he gets a lower grade, regardless of his race. It may seem ironic to Inoue, but it’s actually when teachers start taking anything but the quality of the writing into account that bias is allowed to slip in and influence the grade unfairly.

It’s also important to remember that earning a high letter grade in a college writing course means absolutely nothing if you haven’t actually learned how to write well. Inoue wants to “calculate course grades by labor completed,” but I can tell you as a writer that absolutely no editor is going to judge your work based on the “labor” involved; they’re going to judge based only on the results. I’ve toiled over many columns that I simply couldn’t figure out how to get quite right, only to have them ultimately rejected by my editor for not being of the necessary quality. My “labor” made absolutely no difference in the decision to reject those columns — and it shouldn’t have.

Most Popular

White House

Another Warning Sign

The Mueller report is of course about Russian interference in the 2016 election and about the White House's interference in the resulting investigation. But I couldn’t help also reading the report as a window into the manner of administration that characterizes the Trump era, and therefore as another warning ... Read More

What’s So Great about Western Civilization

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Redacted: Harm to Ongoing Matter), One of the things I tell new parents is something that was told to me when my daughter still had that ... Read More
Film & TV

Jesus Is Not the Joker

Actors love to think they can play anything, but the job of any half-decent filmmaker is to tell them when they’re not right for a part. If the Rock wants to play Kurt Cobain, try to talk him out of it. Adam Sandler as King Lear is not a great match. And then there’s Joaquin Phoenix. He’s playing Jesus ... Read More
White House

The Mueller Report Should Shock Our Conscience

I've finished reading the entire Mueller report, and I must confess that even as a longtime, quite open critic of Donald Trump, I was surprised at the sheer scope, scale, and brazenness of the lies, falsehoods, and misdirections detailed by the Special Counsel's Office. We've become accustomed to Trump making up ... Read More

Supreme Court Mulls Citizenship Question for Census

Washington -- The oral arguments the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday will be more decorous than the gusts of judicial testiness that blew the case up to the nation’s highest tribunal. The case, which raises arcane questions of administrative law but could have widely radiating political and policy ... Read More