Trump’s Immigration Temptation

President Donald Trump talks to reporters in Washington, D.C., March 8, 2019. (Jonathan Ernst/REUTERS)

At various times over the last four years, President Donald Trump has endorsed a large reduction in legal-immigration levels. In 2018, the White House said it would veto any major immigration legislation — even legislation that funded the wall at the border with Mexico — if it did not reduce the numbers by ending chain migration and the diversity lottery.

It may have been a mistake to insist on the point given the lack of congressional support for cuts. But the administration is now sending signals that it is erring in the opposite direction. Over the last month, Trump has suggested on a few occasions that he wants higher immigration levels. In the State of the Union address, he ad-libbed that he wanted legal immigration “in the highest numbers ever.” At a White House event with Apple CEO Tim Cook and other business leaders, Trump said, “So we want to have the companies grow. And the only way they’re going to grow is if we give them the workers.”

We have workers in our country already, and we are continuing every year to take in hundreds of thousands of newcomers from abroad. Businesses that find themselves unable to fill jobs with Americans and the existing flow of immigrants should consider raising wages to attract more of them. That is, in fact, happening: Relatively tight labor markets and economic growth are bringing wages up, particularly at the low end of the labor market. It’s a phenomenon that is helping Trump make good on his promise to do more for blue-collar workers than Republicans usually do.

A big expansion of immigration would undermine that economic progress and subvert that political achievement. Legislation that raised high-skilled immigration while lowering low-skilled immigration would be worth supporting. For Trump to embrace an overall increase, or an increase in low-skilled immigration, would be a mistake as well as a flip-flop. And it is one that risks making some members of his political coalition emigrate from it.

The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

Most Popular

Film & TV

A Sad Finale

Spoilers Ahead. Look, I share David’s love of Game of Thrones. But I thought the finale was largely a bust, for failings David mostly acknowledges in passing (but does not allow to dampen his ardor). The problems with the finale were largely the problems of this entire season. Characters that had been ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Great Misdirection

The House Democrats are frustrated, very frustrated. They’ve gotten themselves entangled in procedural disputes with the Trump administration that no one particularly cares about and that might be litigated for a very long time. A Washington Post report over the weekend spelled out how stymied Democrats ... Read More

Australia’s Voters Reject Leftist Ideas

Hell hath no fury greater than left-wingers who lose an election in a surprise upset. Think Brexit in 2016. Think Trump’s victory the same year. Now add Australia. Conservative prime minister Scott Morrison shocked pollsters and pundits alike with his victory on Saturday, and the reaction has been brutal ... Read More