NR Webathon

The Indispensable National Review

A world without NR is a world without sanity.

Imagine, for a moment, a world without National Review and National Review Online. I think most of our readers would agree that such a world would be poorer — in wisdom, wit, respectful debate, and laughter. (And if you do agree, please consider pitching in with a donation to help us meet our spring fundraising goal.) But if NR ceased to exist, it would be a boon for some — namely, those who’d greatly benefit if the conservative principles that NR stands for were unrepresented and undefended in the marketplace of ideas.

Imagine a world in which the AFL-CIO could tweet “We all need to seize the means of production” and not find itself on the receiving end of Kevin Williamson’s pen.

Or a world in which politicians and talking heads could get away with constitutionally and morally illiterate attacks on unborn life without the patient schooling of Alexandra DeSanctis.

Or a world in which a Democratic presidential candidate could propose a national gun registry and not have his plan dismantled point by point by Charlie Cooke.

Full-throated defenses of our nation’s foundational principles are only going to get more necessary in the coming years, because every generation has to rediscover them for itself. If this weren’t the case, socialism would not be the hot new thing.

As the historian Deirdre Nansen McCloskey wrote in the most recent issue of National Review, “the young ‘socialists’ nowadays have not cracked any books at all, even Marx’s. They rely on blog posts by nonreaders.” One way to combat such ignorance is with blog posts — and full-length essays, podcasts, and videos — by people who have cracked a few books.

Creating and publishing those things takes a lot of resources, though. So we at National Review have always relied, gratefully, on our readers for financial support. And we’re asking you once again to please give whatever you can to help us in this crucial enterprise.

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More