14-Year-Old Suspended for Being Seen with an Airsoft Gun on Snapchat

No harm, no victim — just a kid being a kid

An eighth-grader was suspended from his Silver Spring, Md., private school for three weeks — and not allowed to graduate with his class — because he appeared in some Snapchats with a disabled airsoft gun.

That’s right. According to an article in Reason, the 14-year-old boy appeared in the background of a friend’s video where that friend was holding a disabled airsoft gun, and he also posed for a photo depicting the same friend holding the device to his head. That photo was shared with a mere 13 other friends — and that’s what the school is calling a “very, very serious” offense.

Honestly, give me a break. Maybe it’s just me, but personally, I consider “very, very serious” offenses to be ones that, at a minimum, have some sort of, you know, victim. Someone actually has to get hurt — a couple of boys clowning around with their phones and a disabled not-even-real weapon hardly seems like it could qualify.

Last week, the boy’s father — a nonprofit director named David Bernstein — wrote a piece in the Washington Post saying as much. Bernstein stated that his son had simply been acting like a “knucklehead,” not harming or threatening anyone, so he asked the school to reconsider the severity of the punishment.

“But did the school really need to suspend a kid who they know has never been violent and did nothing intentionally threatening for three weeks?” Bernstein asked. “The principal said my son needed time to reflect on what he had done.”

“What, I wondered, could he possibly learn in a three-week suspension that he couldn’t learn in, say, three days?” he continued. “Indeed, multiple studies show that long-term suspensions make for worse, not better behavior. Why would a school that prides itself on its progressive values resort to a punitive and counterproductive intervention?”

The school, of course, declined — believing that what the boy had done was “very serious” and that it therefore completely warranted suspension through the end of the year.

In this case, Bernstein is right, and the school is wrong. Make no mistake: Posting a photo of some kind of mock hostage situation on social media is not smart, and this boy should absolutely not have done so. The thing is, though, this was a kid — and he didn’t actually hurt anyone. It’s a situation where he needed to learn a lesson, but I really don’t think it would take three weeks for him to do so. In fact, I think that it could have been accomplished in just a single conversation.

Personally, I can’t imagine what it would have been like had social media been around when I was a kid. I was a good kid, but a kid nonetheless — which, of course, means that I did some pretty stupid stuff at times. Thankfully, the only way any of it was ever captured was on a disposable camera, where only I had control of those images. It seemed like punishments were also far less strict than they are these days; I probably would have been suspended for half of my elementary career if I were in school now.

The bottom line is, schools and school districts need to remember that kids are kids and that it’s normal for them to sometimes make mistakes. The focus should be on helping them learn from those mistakes so that they don’t repeat them in the future — not on making their lives miserable with extreme punishments, especially not for transgressions with no victims.

Most Popular

Film & TV

The Manly Appeal of Ford v Ferrari

There used to be a lot of overlap between what we think of as a Hollywood studio picture (designed to earn money) and an awards movie (designed to fill the trophy case, usually with an accompanying loss of money). Ford v Ferrari is a glorious throwback to the era when big stars did quality movies about actual ... Read More
Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More