White House

Trump Should Want a Rapid Impeachment

President Donald Trump boards Air Force One at Morristown municipal airport, August 4, 2019. (Yuri Gripas/Reuters)
As impeachment rumbles on, it puts every Trump lapse — Syria, Doral — in starker relief.

The Ukraine story hasn’t been good for President Donald Trump, and there’s only one way out — to get impeached, and the sooner, the better.

Trump obviously hates the idea of being impeached. He thinks it’s unfair, and he’s raging against the process with every political and legal argument his team can muster and every insult and countercharge he can make on Twitter. But he doesn’t have any choice in the matter.

Impeachment is baked in the cake. There’s no way that Democrats, having opened an impeachment inquiry (although without a vote), can pull up short now. How could they, after touting revelation after revelation, including a supposed “confession” by Trump’s chief of staff? If there are Democrats in swing districts holding the House back from impeachment, Speaker Nancy Pelosi will have no option but to twist their arms to get to a majority when the time comes.

Trump should want it to come as soon as possible. Ukraine news has been bad news for him. The phone call with the Ukrainian president was clearly inappropriate and alarmed all sorts of insiders at the time. There was, at the very least, the thought of squeezing Ukraine by withholding defense aid, although the ploy might have had multiple motives and may never have been carried out (it seems Ukrainian officials didn’t know the aid had been blocked until shortly before it was released). And Rudy Giuliani’s political and business maneuverings in Ukraine are a worrisome black box.

As impeachment rumbles on, it puts every Trump lapse (Syria, Doral, etc.) in starker relief and places it in the context of the question of whether he should be impeached and removed.

Meanwhile, if support for impeachment is about 50 percent or a little higher, there’s every reason for Democrats to stretch it out. The current process suits their purposes nicely. They interview officials in private and then leak the most damaging parts. There’s no danger of public hearings bouncing the wrong way . . . because there are no public hearings.

The impeachment inquiry also has the advantage of giving the Democratic base what it wants and creating a strong sense of action against Trump. When Republicans took the House in the middle of Barack Obama’s first term, they had trouble controlling the expectations of their own base, which wanted immediate results when the GOP had limited power. Impeachment allows Democrats to forestall such a feeling among their own voters, even though they, too, aren’t getting anything substantive done.

This suggests that, as of this moment, Pelosi looks to have judged the politics of impeachment shrewdly, holding off when it still seemed politically premature and striking when the prospect of moving the needle of public opinion presented itself.

Given how impeachment is playing, she should welcome the White House’s reliance on the normal strategy in these fights: attempting to frustrate and delay the inquiry. Not only is this standard approach not fully working — former and current officials are talking to House investigators regardless — but at the margins it lengthens an inquiry that’s working for the Democrats.

All that said, it’s always possible the public will tire of the probe, especially if it reaches past the first month or two of an election year.

What can Trump do about any of this? Absent a mea culpa and a promise of full transparency, which aren’t in the cards for temperamental reasons if nothing else, Trump can’t change the dynamic or the timing. But he should be secretly rooting for the rapid arrival of Impeachment Day (and the near-inevitable acquittal in the Senate).

It will be one of the biggest stories of the Trump presidency. Then, like everything else, it will grow old very fast. Impeachment won’t be forgotten, but it will fade into part of the tapestry of endless Trump controversies and outrages, from Charlottesville to his Helsinki press conference with Vladimir Putin.

Democrats will believe that they struck a decisive blow against Trump, when they really may have helped him turn the page.

 © 2019 by King Features Syndicate

Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He can be reached via email: comments.lowry@nationalreview.com. 

Most Popular


‘Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself’

It was just one more segment to fill out the hour, and thereby fill the long 24 hours of Saturday’s cable news on November 2. Or so it seemed. Navy SEAL Mike Ritland was on the Fox News program Watters World to talk to Jesse Watters about trained German shepherds like the one used in the raid that found ... Read More

A Defining Statement of Modern Conservatism

The greatest documents in American history never lose their ability to astonish. They deserve, and repay, careful study, and inevitably have contemporary resonances no matter how long ago they were written or uttered. There’s no doubt that Ronald Reagan’s “A Time for Choosing” belongs in the top ranks ... Read More
White House

The Russian Conspiracy That Won’t Die

The Mueller report accomplished nothing. Whether you thought that the two-year, $32 million investigation was warranted or not, the report promised to establish a factual record that both sides could accept, especially on the explosive charge that Donald Trump had conspired with the Russians to win the ... Read More
White House

Impeachment Theater of Trolls

As a boy, I used to watch a television show with a weekly gag titled “MasterJoke Theatre.” A pompous egghead smoked a pipe in a leather-bound chair in a richly appointed library, told a joke, and got a pie in the face for his trouble. What the Democrats launched on the Hill this week is their own variant, ... Read More