The Fifth Circuit Rejects the Lie of Transgender Pronouns

A person holds up a flag during rally to protest the Trump administration’s reported proposal to narrow the definition of gender to male or female at birth at City Hall in New York City, October 24, 2018. (Brendan McDermid/Reuters)
A victory for biological truth, and for linguistic truth

NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE C ultural progressives, who reject the very humanity of unborn children but confidently assure us that there are upward of 70 distinct genders, tend to have an uneasy relationship with the truth. And the proliferation of transgender pronouns — the use of biologically inaccurate pronouns to describe those afflicted with gender dysphoria — is among the more pernicious tools in the broader arsenal that progressives use to have us question that truth.

Earlier this month, in U.S. v. Varner, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit boldly refused to appease those who would muddle truth. Over

To Read the Full Story
Josh Hammer is editor-at-large of The Daily Wire, of counsel at First Liberty Institute, and a former judicial law clerk on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.


The Latest