Science & Tech

Is the U.S. Blowing It on Blockchain?

(Kacper Pempel/Reuters)
America is falling behind other nations when it comes to blockchain technology.

Blockchain technology is increasingly being used in a broad range of industries, including financial services, media, telecommunications, health care, agriculture, and energy. Unfortunately, an uncertain and restrictive regulatory landscape is impeding American leadership in this sector. And it may get worse, as congressional backlash over Facebook’s proposed Libra stablecoin intensifies. As a result, Europe and Asia are poised to drive technological development, revenue, jobs, and talent within this burgeoning industry.

Many countries in these markets have smoothed the way for blockchain adoption by making innovative legislative changes, such as a flexible approach to taxation, that address the real risks. The U.S. could fall behind these more sophisticated global players, imperiling both our economic competitiveness and national security.

Blockchain technology is, at its simplest, a powerful database maintained on either a public or private computer network that uses sophisticated encryption. It provides trustworthy and, if necessary, transparent record-keeping. It could revolutionize supply-chain management, streamline medical records, and create digital identities both for enhancing consumer transactions and for other applications where trust is critical. The immense scope and application of blockchain is the foundation of the next leap forward in the digital economy. Representative Bill Foster (D., Ill.), a physicist and likely Congress’s sole blockchain coder, put it succinctly: “Blockchain is a disruptive technology that will change the way we do business in almost every sector.”

Tangible assets — such as gold, property titles, stocks, bonds, etc. — also may be digitized with ownership data archived on a blockchain. Mainstream companies have already adopted many of these applications. JPMorgan’s Quorum, Ernst & Young’s Nightfall, and Microsoft’s Azure are three marquee examples. A particular blockchain technology also may have its own native currency, or “tokens,” which consumers can use to perform specific functions, including file storage, trading rights, and media access, among many others.

Naturally, America’s competitors have not overlooked the power and the promise of blockchain technology to transfer assets and information directly and quickly across expansive networks. The Russian and Chinese intelligence services have labored tirelessly to influence blockchain security protocols. One agent of Russia’s FSB (the KGB’s successor) reportedly boasted that “. . . the Internet belongs to the Americans — but blockchain will belong to us.” And last October, Chinese premier Xi Jinping urged his people to “seize the opportunity” that blockchain offers. China already holds the greatest number of blockchain-related patents, with Chinese patent applications from 2013 to 2018 at 4,435, more than double the U.S. number. Beyond commercial deployment, the Chinese plan to use blockchains to manage the nation’s vast domestic data assets, including those related to its military hardware. Experts also expect blockchain to serve as a critical component of its global “Belt and Road Initiative,” which is at the core of China’s long-term foreign expansion plans. Even less hostile nations, such as Singapore and Germany, have led the way with legislative and regulatory support for blockchain-based companies. Consequentially, they have become blockchain-innovation hubs.

Yet as the world adapts to blockchain, U.S. investments flow offshore. American financiers remain skittish about deploying capital to domestic blockchain opportunities due to regulatory uncertainty over what instruments will be considered a security. A recent survey by the Washington-based Blockchain Association showed that 91 percent of industry participants consider “unclear regulations and guidelines” a significant barrier to their success. Furthermore, the report confirmed that 66 percent of the industry’s largest employers are now based outside of the U.S. This is no surprise, given that the industry’s decentralized nature lets businesses and workers relocate easily to more hospitable locales. This reduces America’s ability to capture a greater share of the estimated trillions in additional global GDP that Web 3.0 will generate in the years to come. Lingering regulatory questions and the lure of friendlier foreign economies jeopardize America’s competitiveness in this growing sector.

If the U.S. blockchain industry ever is to have a fighting chance in the global market, Congress must remove the anchors from the industry’s feet.  Representative Warren Davidson (R., Ohio), an early reform proponent, has told me: “We might not see any action on this in the next five years unless there is a groundswell push.”

Legislation before Congress, such as the various “Token Taxonomy” bills, would clarify the designation of digital assets and assign specific agencies to regulate them. This would eliminate some of the uncertainty plaguing the industry. Congress should also ensure that blockchain companies have a level playing field by removing barriers to accessing banking and insurance products. Washington should also reform the U.S. tax code so that each movement of a digital asset does not create a taxable event and corresponding record-keeping nightmare. America should also follow the direction of China and other nations and explore the digitization of its own currency, so that the U.S. can defend the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency.

The U.S. economy’s resounding growth over the past three decades is largely due to America’s early and substantial investment in the Internet. American innovators helped design and build the infrastructure on which most of today’s economy rests. Thousands of companies that capitalized on this technology succeeded, some spectacularly, and put millions of Americans to work. As with other technologies, American innovators should be focused on bringing the very best products and services to market, not worrying about getting entangled in red tape.

Timothy Furey, CFA is the CEO of Brooklyn-based ConsenSys Digital Securities, one of the U.S.’s first digital asset investment banks.

Most Popular

Culture

Two NFL Apologies

So Drew Brees defended the American flag and all it stands for, said he didn’t agree with kneeling for the national anthem and correctly described this gesture of open disrespect as disrespect. "Is everything right with our country right now?" said the Saints' future Hall of Famer. "No, it is not. We still have ... Read More
Culture

Two NFL Apologies

So Drew Brees defended the American flag and all it stands for, said he didn’t agree with kneeling for the national anthem and correctly described this gesture of open disrespect as disrespect. "Is everything right with our country right now?" said the Saints' future Hall of Famer. "No, it is not. We still have ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Chesterton’s Cops

Conservatives are big on “Chesterton’s fence.” That’s G. K. Chesterton’s principle that you cannot reform what you do not understand, that you should not for the sake of convenience knock down a fence until you understand why it was put up in the first place. When encountering a fence in his way, ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Chesterton’s Cops

Conservatives are big on “Chesterton’s fence.” That’s G. K. Chesterton’s principle that you cannot reform what you do not understand, that you should not for the sake of convenience knock down a fence until you understand why it was put up in the first place. When encountering a fence in his way, ... Read More
Education

Destroy the ‘Public’ Education System

‘Public” schools have been a catastrophe for the United States. This certainly isn’t an original assertion, but as we watch thousands of authoritarian brats tearing down the legacies of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, it’s more apparent than ever. State-run schools have undercut two fundamental ... Read More
Education

Destroy the ‘Public’ Education System

‘Public” schools have been a catastrophe for the United States. This certainly isn’t an original assertion, but as we watch thousands of authoritarian brats tearing down the legacies of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, it’s more apparent than ever. State-run schools have undercut two fundamental ... Read More
Media

The Unrelenting Assault on President Trump

There has never been a presidential campaign in the United States where the administration was so massively opposed by the principal media outlets as in this election. Nor, in at least a century, have the national political media so widely and thoroughly discarded the traditional criterion for journalistic ... Read More
Media

The Unrelenting Assault on President Trump

There has never been a presidential campaign in the United States where the administration was so massively opposed by the principal media outlets as in this election. Nor, in at least a century, have the national political media so widely and thoroughly discarded the traditional criterion for journalistic ... Read More
Media

The Media’s War on Words

I recently ran across a piece in the Philadelphia Inquirer that lays out four racist words and phrases that should be banished from the English language. It begins like this: Editor’s note: Please be aware offensive terms are repeated here solely for the purpose of identifying and analyzing them honestly. ... Read More
Media

The Media’s War on Words

I recently ran across a piece in the Philadelphia Inquirer that lays out four racist words and phrases that should be banished from the English language. It begins like this: Editor’s note: Please be aware offensive terms are repeated here solely for the purpose of identifying and analyzing them honestly. ... Read More
Culture

Why Progressives Wage War on History

Princeton University’s decision to remove the name “Woodrow Wilson” from its School of Public and International Affairs is a big win for progressive activists, and the implications will extend far beyond the campus. It hardly surprises me, in today’s polarizing environment, that my alma mater caved to ... Read More
Culture

Why Progressives Wage War on History

Princeton University’s decision to remove the name “Woodrow Wilson” from its School of Public and International Affairs is a big win for progressive activists, and the implications will extend far beyond the campus. It hardly surprises me, in today’s polarizing environment, that my alma mater caved to ... Read More

Canceled, &c.

There was a headline last week: “Boeing Communications Chief Resigns Over Decades-Old Article on Women in Combat.” Find the story here. It explains that “Niel Golightly abruptly resigned on Thursday, following an employee’s complaint over an article the former U.S. military pilot wrote 33 years ago ... Read More

Canceled, &c.

There was a headline last week: “Boeing Communications Chief Resigns Over Decades-Old Article on Women in Combat.” Find the story here. It explains that “Niel Golightly abruptly resigned on Thursday, following an employee’s complaint over an article the former U.S. military pilot wrote 33 years ago ... Read More