NR Webathon

NR Has Had Amy Barrett’s Back Since 2017 

Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett reacts during the final minutes of her testimony on the third day of her Senate confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill, October 14, 2020. (Susan Walsh/Pool via Reuters)
And when it comes to Kamala Harris's discrimination against Catholics, we've had her number from the get-go.

Judicial confirmation fights are among the most interesting occasions to be a political opinion writer. It’s at times like this that I’m especially grateful to work at National Review, where I’m permitted and encouraged to write about the issues that are most important to me, issues that matter to conservatives and to our readers. Providing that sort of timely, careful reporting and analysis takes plenty of work, and that’s why we’re counting on you to consider supporting our efforts.

When President Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in 2017, I had been at National Review for only a year, but I had the opportunity to break a story that is still making headlines to this day: when Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein criticized Barrett’s Catholic faith, saying, “The dogma lives loudly within you, and that’s of concern.”

Ever since then, National Review has been at the forefront of calling attention to progressives who use a judicial nominee’s religious faith to attempt to disqualify the nominee from serving on the bench. As Barrett’s 2017 hearings continued, I kept up my reporting, pressing the offices of Democratic senators to explain why they were scrutinizing her Catholic beliefs.

In 2019, I wrote about how Democratic senators Kamala Harris and Mazie Hirono grilled Brian Buescher, a Catholic judicial nominee, over his membership in the Knights of Columbus and suggested that it made him unfit to serve. I noted at the time that perhaps Democrats were pioneering a strategy to use against Barrett should she ever be nominated to the Supreme Court.

Now that day has come, and we at NR have been working harder than ever to bring you the best information about this important fight — not only over whether the eminently qualified Barrett will be confirmed to the Court but also over whether Democrats will be able to continue making these sorts of attacks.

I’m far from the only one of our writers who has been covering Barrett’s confirmation with intense focus, but I’ve done my part, writing about Kamala Harris’s anti-Catholic bigotry toward Knights of Columbus members, the inappropriate questions Harris has posed to nominees about their religious beliefs, and the many times that Democrats have zeroed in on religion as a way of scrutinizing conservative judges.

I’ve also pushed back against the narrative that Barrett’s involvement in the lay Christian group People of Praise constitutes membership in an abusive, ultraconservative cult or that her membership is evidence of anything other than her desire to practice her faith. I’ve pointed out that, if Barrett were a liberal, left-wing feminists would hold her up as an icon. Instead, as I wrote in another piece, feminists denigrate her because her life story illustrates that a woman can be highly accomplished and have a successful career without sacrificing her desire to have a large, loving family.

And this week, I’ve focused on covering the confirmation hearings, capturing one of Barrett’s most poignant comments on the issue of racism and refuting Senator Cory Booker’s lies about Roe v. Wade, among other stories.

Without National Review, these and other crucial moments would pass without mention. All of our newspapers and the websites of every major publication should be delivering this kind of careful, accurate reporting. Unfortunately, that’s not the case. That’s why we need your support to keep our difficult, essential work going, and we’re grateful for your continued generosity.

Most Popular

Media

About That ‘Uncoverable’ Biden Story

Journalists claim they can’t cover the New York Post’s Hunter Biden email scoop because the underlying evidence has yet to been verified. Also, they won’t look for any verifying evidence because there isn’t enough evidence. It’s quite the conundrum. Because other than the now-corroborated emails, ... Read More
Media

About That ‘Uncoverable’ Biden Story

Journalists claim they can’t cover the New York Post’s Hunter Biden email scoop because the underlying evidence has yet to been verified. Also, they won’t look for any verifying evidence because there isn’t enough evidence. It’s quite the conundrum. Because other than the now-corroborated emails, ... Read More

Another Pollster Sees a Trump Win

The Trafalgar Group’s Robert Cahaly is an outlier among pollsters in that he thinks President Trump will carry Michigan, Pennsylvania, or both, and hence be reelected with roughly 280 electoral votes. (I explained his thinking here.) Last week another pollster, Jim Lee of Susquehanna Polling and Research, ... Read More

Another Pollster Sees a Trump Win

The Trafalgar Group’s Robert Cahaly is an outlier among pollsters in that he thinks President Trump will carry Michigan, Pennsylvania, or both, and hence be reelected with roughly 280 electoral votes. (I explained his thinking here.) Last week another pollster, Jim Lee of Susquehanna Polling and Research, ... Read More
White House

Hell, Yes

Editor’s Note: If you would like to read more pros and cons on voting for President Trump, further essays on the subject, each from a different perspective, can be found here, here, here, here, and here. These articles, and the one below, reflect the views of the individual authors, not of the National ... Read More
White House

Hell, Yes

Editor’s Note: If you would like to read more pros and cons on voting for President Trump, further essays on the subject, each from a different perspective, can be found here, here, here, here, and here. These articles, and the one below, reflect the views of the individual authors, not of the National ... Read More
Media

‘Anonymous’ Falls Flat

On the menu today: The op-ed page of the New York Times made the deliberate decision to hoodwink America about the identity of “Anonymous”; the sense of guilt that pervades legacy media -- a very apt label; and wondering whether or not we will even see long lines on Election Day with early voting being so ... Read More
Media

‘Anonymous’ Falls Flat

On the menu today: The op-ed page of the New York Times made the deliberate decision to hoodwink America about the identity of “Anonymous”; the sense of guilt that pervades legacy media -- a very apt label; and wondering whether or not we will even see long lines on Election Day with early voting being so ... Read More

Hunter Biden on Tape?

In a newly released recording, a man purported to be Hunter Biden is heard rambling about (a) his legal representation of Patrick Ho, a convicted former Hong Kong official he refers to as “the f***ing spy chief of China”; (b) his business dealings with Ye Jianming, the corrupt Chinese high roller, whom Hunter ... Read More

Hunter Biden on Tape?

In a newly released recording, a man purported to be Hunter Biden is heard rambling about (a) his legal representation of Patrick Ho, a convicted former Hong Kong official he refers to as “the f***ing spy chief of China”; (b) his business dealings with Ye Jianming, the corrupt Chinese high roller, whom Hunter ... Read More