Time for Hard Choices on Federal Drug Enforcement

Oregon’s decriminalization of hard narcotics should compel the feds to end the ambiguity over drug policy — while respecting state sovereignty.

Share this story

A marijuana plant at the Botanacare marijuana store ahead of their grand opening on New Year’s day in Northglenn, Colo., December 31, 2013.

Rick Wilking/Reuters

With controversy over the 2020 election still stirring, a notable development has escaped much attention. Not only has the national trend toward legalizing marijuana continued, a Rubicon has been crossed: Oregon adopted a ballot initiative that decriminalizes the possession of hard narcotics, including heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamines.

No, it is not a green-light for drug trafficking — not yet at least. The ballot initiative approved in the Beaver State aims to strike the criminal penalties for the possession of personal-use amounts of illegal narcotics, generally a misdemeanor, not possession of greater amounts, which indicates an intent to engage in felony distribution. Selling or otherwise transmitting drugs is still a state crime.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement