The Six-Trillion-Dollar President Gambles with the Economy

President Joe Biden speaks during a news conference with Virginia Governor Ralph Northam in Alexandria, Va., May 28, 2021. (Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters)

And even liberals are starting to worry about the stakes.

Sign in here to read more.

And even liberals are starting to worry about the stakes.

J oe Biden finally released his proposed federal budget Friday, just before the Memorial Day holiday. It’s almost as if the White House didn’t want people to look at it too closely.

The Congressional Budget Office reports that if everything that Biden has proposed were to be approved by the Democratic Congress, the national debt would climb by $22 trillion over the next decade. That’s a $7.6 trillion increase in the deficit, and that’s after the recovery from COVID-19’s disruptions.

Here’s how the numbers stack up:

The publicly held debt would skyrocket from 98 percent of GDP in 2020 to 130 percent by 2031, eclipsing the debt level of 114 percent held by the U.S. just after it fought World War II.

Team Biden has de­cid­ed that the big mis­take Democrats made in the past was ever think­ing they should wor­ry about deficits, the debt, or a no­tion that you can spend too much mon­ey. The par­ty consen­sus is that for­mer Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma went “too small” dur­ing the Great Reces­sion of 2009 with a stim­u­lus pack­age of un­der a tril­lion dol­lars.

In­deed, Sen­ate ma­jor­i­ty leader Chuck Schumer told CNN in March: “We made a big mis­take in 2009 and 2010. . . . We cut back on the Oba­ma stim­u­lus dra­mat­i­cal­ly, and we stayed in re­ces­sion for five years.”

It’s iron­ic that De­moc­rats are now throw­ing Oba­ma un­der a bus and agree­ing he had a rot­ten record on the econ­o­my, with his poli­cies caus­ing a “five-year re­ces­sion.” That five-year re­ces­sion was one of the long­est in mod­ern times — a mini-de­pres­sion.

Back in 2009, the De­moc­rats promised that their “shov­el-ready” projects would cause an­nu­al growth of 4 per­cent or more. But they nev­er came close. In­deed, it was Vice Pres­i­dent Joe Biden who a decade ago promised a “sum­mer of re­cov­ery” that nev­er ar­rived.

So De­moc­rats be­lieve their near­ly $1 tril­lion of bor­row­ing and waste­ful spend­ing in 2009 tanked the econ­o­my but that $6 tril­lion will now de­liv­er eco­nom­ic pros­per­i­ty. Good luck with that.

The eye-popping numbers in Biden’s budget are finally leading even some liberals to express worries.

Mike Allen of Axios reports that “some Democrats and economists have begun to worry that President Biden, intent on FDR-like transformation of a wounded America, is doing too much, too fast.”

Larry Summers, the treasury secretary under President Bill Clinton and the head of the National Economic Council under Obama, told Bloomberg News back in March that he thought Biden was pursuing “the least responsible macroeconomic policy we’ve had in the last 40 years.”

In late May, he followed that up with a warning that his initial fears about higher inflation were understated: “Data are pointing more towards higher inflation than I expected, and sooner.” Summers was backed up by uber-investor Warren Buffett, who warned, “We are seeing very substantial inflation.”

Summers has some agreement from other liberal economists. Jason Furman, the chairman of Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, told Politico last week that Summers is merely saying “what everyone is saying over coffee and whispering. . . . He’s an outlier in the public debate because the people that have megaphones aren’t saying this on the Democratic side, but he’s well within a consensus view in the economics profession.” On Saturday, Furman tweeted that it is his sense in talking with “academic macroeconomists that are not part of the DC debate that about 90 percent plus think (Biden’s) American Rescue Plan was too large and 70 percent plus think the Fed is currently too dovish.”

But Biden isn’t listening to economists very much. He has been be­witched by a pa­rade of lib­er­al pun­dits and his­to­ri­ans who have met with him. Their im­plied mes­sage: As a like­ly one-term pres­i­dent due to age, you can still go down in his­to­ry as a near-great pres­i­dent if you cre­ate your own New Deal or Great So­ci­ety.

In­deed, after a re­cent meet­ing in­volv­ing Biden and pres­i­den­tial his­to­ri­ans at the White House, his­to­ri­an Michael Beschloss gushed to Axios that FDR or LBJ may be the most apt anal­o­gy as to how Biden is “trans­form­ing the coun­try in im­por­tant ways in a short time.”

But Democratic strategists aren’t sure the rush for future history books makes political sense. “Democrats are like kids being given the keys to the candy store right now,” one Democratic strategist told The Hill newspaper. “We have all this candy, and we’ll worry about the stomach ache later.”

Another strategist confessed: “I’m struggling with what their end game is. They may be thinking, ‘We’re going to lose the midterms anyway.’”

Indeed, while Biden’s approval rating remains over 50 percent, there are signs he could soon be vulnerable on the economy. A new Fox News poll found that 18 percent of Democrats believe his spending is excessive. One in six Democrats see him as too liberal — 16 percent, up from 9 percent the last time Fox asked the question.

But the Biden White House believes that the pub­lic’s will­ing­ness to ac­cept gov­ern­ment in­ter­ven­tion to fight the pandemic pro­vides the per­fect cover for the Biden Binge.

Pres­i­dent Oba­ma’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, fa­mous­ly said in 2008, “You nev­er want a se­ri­ous cri­sis to go to waste. And what I mean by that, it’s an op­por­tu­ni­ty to do things that you think you could not do be­fore.” Asked if he still felt that way af­ter Biden’s vic­to­ry, Emanuel said last year: “You have a 100-year pan­dem­ic, a 75-year eco­nom­ic de­pression, and a 50-year civ­il and racial un­rest. It’s nat­u­ral­ly an op­por­tu­ni­ty . . . to redo things.”

So the Biden budget will be one of the biggest political gambles in American history. The problem is that the budget chips being pushed into the middle of this poker game belong to the American people and their descendants. They have yet to fully realize it’s their economic future that is being gambled with.

John Fund is National Review’s national-affairs reporter and a fellow at the Committee to Unleash Prosperity.
You have 1 article remaining.
You have 2 articles remaining.
You have 3 articles remaining.
You have 4 articles remaining.
You have 5 articles remaining.
Exit mobile version