Back to Square One in the War on Terror

A U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter from Task Force Heavy Cav flies over Afghanistan in support of the 48th Infantry Brigade Combat Team during Operation Freedom’s Sentinel and NATO Operation Resolute Support, May 2019. (Sergeant Jordan Trent/US Army)

Biden gives al-Qaeda back its safe haven.  

Sign in here to read more.

Biden gives al-Qaeda back its safe haven.  

I n time, the harrowing images from Afghanistan will disappear from television screens. Americans will debate the incompetence of the final withdrawal, which maximized the defeat, the betrayal of friends and allies, and the blow to America’s credibility and prestige. And then America will move on, as Afghanistan slides once again into the awful tyranny of illiterate religious fanatics.

And then, the more discerning will notice that Afghanistan suddenly looks almost exactly as it looked just before September 11, 2001: a massive safe haven for terrorists of global reach, nested within one of the world’s most prolific state sponsors of terrorism.

More than a decade ago, Joseph Biden was a proponent of the “over the horizon” strategy for dealing with Afghanistan. He advocated a reduced footprint in Afghanistan focused on roving airborne search-and-destroy missions, while leaving the Afghans to sort out their political situation largely for themselves.

As a staffer in the Senate, I sympathized with the concept but had grave doubts that it could work. For one thing, it was at odds with the strategy adopted after 9/11 to disrupt and ultimately defeat Islamist terrorist organizations of global reach.

Since we seem to have forgotten, let’s recall what that strategy was. To disrupt the terrorists, we would deprive them of the ability to operate, cutting off their sources of financing, infiltrating their communications, and attacking them everywhere they could be found. We would keep them on their heels, fighting just to survive, and therefore unable to plan and execute mass-casualty terrorist attacks.

But to defeat them in the long run, the Bush administration realized that we needed to defeat their messianic ideology, the thing that gives the terrorists the willingness to fight and blow themselves up. As long as large numbers of Muslims continue to believe in that depraved and barbaric version of Islam, there would always be fresh recruits to take the place of those we killed and captured. In order to defeat their ideology, we had to convince people in terrorism’s recruiting grounds that they had no chance of winning, that try as they might, they could only suffer one defeat after another. We had to break their will to fight, just as we had done to the Soviet Union.

The Bush administration also realized that Islamist terror networks were present in 60 or more countries with whom we were not at war. The first and most important line of defense against those terrorists would be the law enforcement and military capabilities of those countries. Hence, “partnership capacity building” quickly became a large part of what the Departments of State and Defense did on a daily basis. That entailed a commitment to friends, partners, and allies.

Long story short, the “over-the-horizon” strategy contradicted every element of the post-9/11 strategy. Those doubts were borne out when Obama defaulted to his own “over-the-horizon” strategy when he abandoned Iraq to its own devices in 2011.

Most of us didn’t realize at the time that when Obama pulled U.S. forces out of Iraq, he also pulled out all our “ISR”: Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance. So when ISIS began its dramatic advance across the Middle East, all we had going was satellite intelligence — not much help against fighters who dress like everyone else and roll around in Toyotas.

In a region of the world teeming with U.S. military and intelligence assets, Iraq had become a black hole: No AC-130s, no helicopters, no drones, no special forces, no regular soldiers within hundreds of miles. That’s what the “over-the-horizon” strategy looked like in Iraq. Those assets all need local operating bases, and we had none. Satellites and supersonic aircraft were of no help against ISIS.

So after some pointless airstrikes, we had to put U.S. forces back into Iraq. And because we had no ISR to start with, U.S. forces had to start their intelligence-gathering from scratch.

Unlike Iraq, Afghanistan is not in a region teeming with U.S. military and intelligence assets. Afghanistan is remote and landlocked, cut off from the reach of U.S. forces at sea by hundreds of miles of land belonging to Pakistan and Iran, among other countries that will not be jumping to give our Air Force overflight rights. We don’t have a useful military base within a thousand miles of Afghanistan.

Add to all those obstacles an entirely new one that could loom larger than all the rest: China. Its Belt and Road strategy doesn’t worry about human rights. The Chinese may be willing to lend the new government of Afghanistan significant support, perhaps even weapons, in exchange for access. I can’t think of anything Afghanistan has that China would want, but it might benefit China to curry favor with the Taliban if only to help keep its own Uyghurs (who are Muslim) under control. If Chinese projects start popping up all over Afghanistan, then we may have to cede the whole area to China’s sphere of influence, as we have done in Africa and elsewhere, reduced to standing by and watching in helpless impotence as the Chinese arm another state sponsor of terrorism.

The humiliating end of America’s 20-year mission to keep Afghanistan free of terrorist safe havens begs the question: What next? President Biden, supremely confident in his own good judgment, will assure the nation that he has a plan. But his plan can’t work. That will become obvious soon enough if it isn’t already. In Afghanistan, the clock has just been dialed back exactly 20 years, to the weeks before the attacks of September 11. Like Obama did in Iraq, Biden has now made sure that nobody can say that America’s years of sacrifice and thousands of soldiers lost in Afghanistan were worth it. Biden has given al-Qaeda back its safe haven, demonstrated once again that Americans have become totally unreliable allies, and given the terrorists the one thing they needed most in the long run: an inspiring, incredible victory over the United States.

As for the rest, it’s back to square one.

PHOTOS: The Fall of Afghanistan

You have 1 article remaining.
You have 2 articles remaining.
You have 3 articles remaining.
You have 4 articles remaining.
You have 5 articles remaining.
Exit mobile version