NR Webathon

The Media Won’t Stop Lying about Abortion

Pro-abortion demonstrators hold up photographs of U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Chief Justice John Roberts during a protest in New York City, May 3, 2022. (Jeenah Moon/Reuters)
But we won’t let them get away with it.

On no topic has the press been more consistently, and persistently, biased than on abortion. Americans, whatever their own views on the matter, have been poorly served by its coverage. Thoughtful journalists have long recognized it: In 1990, the Los Angeles Times ran a series of articles about the systematic tilt. But the problem hasn’t gotten better.

This leaves our writers with plenty of work — and we’ve done it. But to continue to do so, we need your support in our ongoing webathon, which is what helps make all of our efforts possible.

If you seek receipts, we have plenty of them.

We have been especially busy countering ignorant criticisms of Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion in Dobbs (the one that overturned Roe v. Wade). When the New York Times distorted his opinion or pretended he ignored a key precedent, we pushed back. When Politico said he had mangled the history of abortion, we went to the primary sources that showed he was right.

The policy debate that followed Dobbs followed the same pattern. Democrats, with much of the press behind them, portrayed themselves as moderates and said Republicans were enacting laws so extreme they would endanger women with ectopic pregnancies. We got Mandela Barnes, the Democratic Senate candidate in Wisconsin, to admit that he opposed limits on abortion at any stage of pregnancy. And we pointed out that “Every Abortion Law in America Protects Women with Ectopic Pregnancies.”

And when reporters called restrictions on abortion after 15 weeks “sweeping bans,” we pointed out they prohibited fewer than 10 percent of all abortions.

National Review is a strongly pro-life publication in a media environment where that stance is all too rare. We’re also a strongly pro-truth publication — and on this issue, that means presenting facts that you won’t find anywhere else.

If you’d like to help us keep performing this vital work, please donate here. As Rich announced yesterday, thanks to a generous donor, all contributions will be matched up to $100,000. That means if you can give $5, it will be $10; $100 will be $200; $5,000 will be $10,000 — and so on. So please help us take advantage of this amazing good fortune.

Thank you so much for reading, and for your continued support.

 

 

Exit mobile version