

National Review does not take any government money, or expect taxpayers to support us against their will.
National Review does not have a billionaire owner whom we simultaneously resent, berate in public, and expect to bankroll us indefinitely irrespective of the quality and quantity of our work.
Instead, National Review has subscribers, friends, and small donors, whom we periodically ask to support us — if, and only if, they like what we are doing. This is one of those periodic asks: If you like what we are doing, please support us.
At National Review, we believe that we produce one of the best, most influential, and most independent-minded publications in the world. Yes, sometimes, that last part gets us in trouble. But in our business, there’s not much point in being anything less than bloody-minded. If, as some do, you dislike us for that trait, then we hope we can win you over. But if you love us for it, please help us keep on keeping on by contributing to our webathon.
Every day, our staff goes to work with just one aim in mind: to argue what we believe, without reference to fashion, pressure, or the preferences of those outside our walls. This we have done since 1955, and this we will do for as long as we can keep the lights on.
As it happens, what we believe is pretty important right now. Pick an important principle, be it free speech, open markets, the rule of law, a strong foreign policy, or the virtue of the Declaration of Independence, and you will find vehement opposition to it on both the left and the right. If it sometimes feels as if every battle in American life has to be fought again and again and again, that is because it does. Parties rise and fall; coalitions coalesce and break apart; vibes shift and dissipate, but the old temptations remain. The purpose of National Review is to resist those temptations, whomever it might thrill or annoy. If it thrills you, please chip in here.