Nominees to the Supreme Court have plenty of good reasons not to opine on legal issues that could come before the Court in the future.
Our equal creation, rather than our sex, skin, or group, is necessary to ground human dignity and our respect for every individual.
It enabled abortion clinics to launch an attack on a wide variety of abortion regulations.
The justices have given signs that they’re going to go slow on the abortion issue.
It is long past time to bury the proposed amendment.
If senators can properly and publicly look for an ‘originalist’ philosophy in judicial nominees, they can look for a ‘right to life’ philosophy as well.
On the Hellerstedt case (2016) and the scope of state abortion laws.
The Supreme Court& decided today not to hear Arizona’s appeal in defense of its 20-week limit on abortion, but that doesn’t mean 20-week limits are unconstitutional. The Court simply declined ...
When a Texas federal district court in Planned Parenthood v. Abbott struck down and issued an injunction against two sections of Texas’s health and safety regulations on abortion clinics on ...
Twenty years ago today, on Monday, June 29, 1992, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, a tragic mistake in the view of pro-life Americans ...