What he’s implicitly saying is that his choice to be financially responsible has cost him things that money cannot replace.
Despite the fact that Clinton has been in politics for decades, it seems that her political instincts are actually quite terrible.
It seems to suggest, after all, that there is no place for an independent in politics.
Objectively outlandish arguments like this hurt your legitimate criticisms.
And the policy wording is very ambiguous.
Throughout his career, he has repeatedly shown blatant disrespect for individual rights and civil liberties.
There is a reason why the Founders gave Congress the sole power to declare war in the first place.
We have to hold him accountable.
It deserves to be sued.
When our government passes laws based on the emotional whims of media and public hysteria rather than statistical fact, the American people lose.