Bench Memos

Andrew Ferguson’s “Revenge of the Sociologists”

A follow-up to my posts last month on two new peer-reviewed articles in an academic journal that expose and challenge the schlock social science on gay parenting that has been uncritically embraced and propagated by so many people eager to advance the cause of gay marriage:

In “Revenge of the Sociologists: The perils of politically incorrect academic research,” the Weekly Standard’s Andrew Ferguson discusses the “professional intimidation” of Mark Regnerus, author of one of the articles. As Ferguson sums it up, a “large number of [Regnerus’s] fellow social scientists—members in good standing of the guild of LGBT researchers—would like to destroy his career”—all, it seems clear, merely because Regnerus has dared to publish a study that calls into question the unthinking orthodoxy on gay parenting.

Regnerus’s study definitely has its limitations. But, as Ferguson wryly points out, the criticisms of his paper “would be more impressive if they weren’t anticipated and in many cases acknowledged by the author in the same paper being criticized.” Further, “Regnerus’s study has unique strengths, even beyond the size and randomness of its sample, that his critics ignore altogether.”

Most importantly:

The limitations of Regnerus’s study compare favorably with the shortcomings found routinely in the same-sex literature. It does no credit to the guild that researchers have choked on Regnerus’s paper while happily swallowing dozens of faulty studies over the last 20 years—because, you can’t help but think, those studies were taken as confirming the “no difference” dogma. “If the Regnerus study is to be thrown out,” wrote the Canadian family economist Douglas Allen in a statement supporting Regnerus, “then practically everything else [in the literature] has to go with it.”

Most Popular

White House

For Democrats, the Party’s Over

If the Democrats are really tempted by impeachment, bring it on. Since the day after the 2016 election they have been threatening this, placing their chips on the Russian-collusion fantasy and then on the phantasmagoric charade of obstruction of justice. The attorney general accurately gave the ingredients of the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Worst Cover-Up of All Time

President Donald Trump may be guilty of many things, but a cover-up in the Mueller probe isn’t one of them. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, attempting to appease forces in the Democratic party eager for impeachment, is accusing him of one, with all the familiar Watergate connotations. The charge is strange, ... Read More
PC Culture

TV Before PC

Affixing one’s glance to the rear-view mirror is usually as ill-advised as staring at one’s own reflection. Still, what a delight it was on Wednesday to see a fresh rendition of “Those Were the Days,” from All in the Family, a show I haven’t watched for nearly 40 years. This time it was Woody Harrelson ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Democrats’ Other Class War

There is a class war going on inside the Democratic party. Consider these two cris de couer: Writing in the New York Times under the headline “America’s Cities Are Unlivable — Blame Wealthy Liberals,” Farhad Manjoo argues that rich progressives have, through their political domination of cities such as ... Read More
Culture

The Deepfake of Nancy Pelosi

You’ve almost made it to a three-day weekend! Making the click-through worthwhile: A quick note about how National Review needs your help, concerns about “deepfakes” of Nancy Pelosi, one of the most cringe-inducing radio interviews of all time, some news about where to find me and the book in the near ... Read More