Bench Memos

Law & the Courts

The Florist and the Cake Artist

The Supreme Court has granted review of the certiorari petition in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. That petition presents the question whether Colorado’s public-accommodations law violated the Free Speech or Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment when it was used to compel cake artist Jack Phillips to create a custom cake honoring a same-sex marriage in violation of his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage.

Also pending before the Court is the certiorari petition in Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. Washington, which presents the question whether the compelled creation and sale of custom floral arrangements to celebrate a wedding, along with compelled attendance at the wedding ceremony, violates the Free Speech or Free Exercise Clauses.

In its amicus brief in support of the Arlene’s Flowers petition, the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty sensibly encourages the Court to hear the two cases in tandem. As the Becket Fund explains, while the two cases have some overlap, the Arlene’s Flowers petition presents “significant factual and legal aspects that are present in a large number of [religious wedding vendor] cases” but that are not involved in Masterpiece Cakeshop. (See amicus brief at 7-14 for specifics.) Further, “the Court has not hesitated to hear together appeals that present related-but-different factual and legal permutations” and “has frequently heard appeals in tandem when certiorari was granted on different dates,” and doing so here would “save Court resources and provide needed guidance to lower courts.”

Most Popular

Film & TV

The Manly Appeal of Ford v Ferrari

There used to be a lot of overlap between what we think of as a Hollywood studio picture (designed to earn money) and an awards movie (designed to fill the trophy case, usually with an accompanying loss of money). Ford v Ferrari is a glorious throwback to the era when big stars did quality movies about actual ... Read More
Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More