Bench Memos

Clark Neily’s Terms of Engagement—Part 6

See Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

My posts have highlighted my disagreements with Clark Neily, and I’ve neglected to praise him for his achievement in writing a clear, accessible, intelligent—and, yes, engaging—book that does an excellent job making an argument that, alas (for the reasons I’ve spelled out), I believe to be badly misguided. In further defense of Neily, I think that it’s fair to say that in his book he’s been effectively carrying out his job responsibilities as an accomplished senior litigator at the Institute for Justice. Indeed, it’s perhaps best to understand the book as an extended brief that aims to condition the environment to make judges more receptive to the claims of IJ plaintiffs.

I do wish that Neily—and IJ more generally—had instead decided to embrace the paradigm of judicial restraint and to argue that the virtue of judicial restraint stands between the opposing vices of judicial activism and judicial passivism. Indeed, I don’t think it surprising that judges who invent rights that aren’t in the Constitution also ignore those that are. Nor is it surprising that a citizenry that is infantilized by the excesses of an activist judiciary won’t be accustomed to exercise due care in implementing those responsibilities that are left to it.

More broadly, whatever the limitations of judicial activism, judicial restraint, and judicial passivism as terms of political discourse, they signal important separation-of-powers concerns about the proper role of the courts in our constitutional republic, and they are a lot more meaningful than the empty and clumsy terms of judicial engagement (oh, when’s the marriage?) and judicial abdication.

Most Popular

National Security & Defense

In Defense of the Iraq War

Today is the 16th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, and Twitter is alive with condemnations of the conflict -- countered by precious few defenses. Yet I believed the Iraq War was just and proper in 2003, and I still believe that today. When Donald Trump condemned the war during the 2015 primary campaign and ... Read More

In Defense of the Electoral College

Senator Elizabeth Warren has joined a growing chorus within the Democratic party in calling for the abolition of the Electoral College. Speaking at a forum in Mississippi on Monday night, Warren said that she hoped to ensure that “every vote matters” and proposed that “the way we can make that happen is ... Read More