Bench Memos

Correction on “Polling Shenanigans?”

Oops.  A reader familiar with polling methods and jargon corrects my misunderstanding of the number of black respondents in the poll:

What the Post did with the extra interviews of blacks is called “oversampling,” and … there’s nothing wrong with it.  If the Post is doing what pollsters normally do, all they’ve done is interview extra African-Americans for the purpose of lowering the margin of error for only the African-American portion of the sample.  In other words, the results WaPo is reporting for ”adults” only consists of results from the sample 1,125 adults, and that sample contains a percentage of African-Americans proportionate to the population as a whole; the purpose of the extra interviews of African-Americans is to enable the pollsters to have a sample of African-Americans that is large enough so that they can have a meaningfully report results just for that population segment.… 

This same reader adds this insight: 

I think the real point to be made about the WaPo poll results is that, notwithstanding the addition of Roberts and Alito to the Supreme Court, it appears an overwhelming majority of Americans believe that the Court is either just right or too liberal.… And what’s so surprising about the fact that 31% think the Supreme Court is too conservative?  Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, for example, would get at least that percentage in a general election. 

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Did Flynn Lie?

At the outset, let’s get two things straight: First, there is something deeply disturbing about the Obama administration’s decision to open a counterintelligence investigation on retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn while he was working on the Trump campaign — and, ultimately, about the Justice ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Where Is the Flynn 302?

Better late than never (I hope), my weekend column has posted on the website. It deals with the question whether General Michael Flynn actually lied to the FBI agents — including the now infamous Peter Strzok — when they interviewed him in the White House on his third day on the job as national security ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Who’s in Charge Here?

In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump was asked on many occasions whether he would “accept the results” of the election if he were to lose. Democrats and their media allies demanded that he make a solemn vow to “accept the results.” It was never entirely clear what anybody thought ... Read More

G-File Mailbag: The Results of a Bad Idea

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including those of you just standing there eating Zarg nuts), I had a bad idea. It wasn’t a terrible idea, like asking a meth addict ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Collusion Scenario

It has become an article of faith in some quarters on the right -- well, most -- that the Mueller investigation has found no evidence of collusion with Russia and has accordingly shifted gears to process crimes like lying to the FBI or obstruction of justice. Having decided that this must be true, many have ... Read More