2000—In dissent (in City of Erie v. Pap’s A.M.), Justice Stevens, joined by Justice Ginsburg, opines that an ordinance generally barring public nudity violates First Amendment speech protections. Amidst discussion of pasties and G-strings, Stevens complains that the ordinance was adopted in response to a specific concern about nude dancing at strip clubs rather than about public nudity in general. So what? As Justice Scalia responds: “As far as appears (and as seems overwhelmingly likely), the preamble, the councilmembers’ comments, and the chosen definition of the prohibited conduct simply reflect the fact that Erie had recently been having a public nudity problem not with streakers, sunbathers or hot-dog vendors, but with lap dancers.”
The Latest
The Problem with ‘Systemic Racism’
Biden’s argument that racial animus is an omnipresent force in American life only sows discord and makes reforms harder to achieve.
Reagan’s Challenger Speech: A Four-Minute Window into Presidential Greatness
Thirty-five years later, there is much to learn from one of the most enduring and poignant presidential addresses and how it came to be.
A Trans Campaigner Speaks Out against Biden’s Transgender Activism
Biden’s trans policies are ‘doing nobody any favors,’ says Scott Newgent.
Biden’s Climate-Change Folly
If he treated the issue as more than an occasion for taxpayer-funded political patronage, he might actually get somewhere.
America First, Biden-Style
Economic nationalism has become the new ‘Washington Consensus.’
The ‘After Trump’ Era Begins
Presto: Nothing the president can do about COVID deaths! And don’t even think about a special counsel to investigate collusion or quid pro quos.