Bench Memos

D.C. Circuit Nominee Cornelia Pillard—Part 2

See Part 1

A former colleague of D.C. Circuit nominee Cornelia Pillard describes her to me as “Reinhardt in a skirt but less moderate.” Given that Ninth Circuit judge Stephen Reinhardt has a strong claim to being the most aggressive leftist ever to sit on a federal court of appeals, it’s difficult to imagine a more damning assessment.

Another person, a legal academic who is familiar with Pillard’s work on matters concerning sex, abortion, and the family, tells me that Pillard is a “complete ideologue” on those matters, someone who will “twist constitutional doctrine to suit the liberal cause du jour.”

The first of Pillard’s law-review articles that I have waded through—“Our Other Reproductive Choices: Equality in Sex Education, Contraceptive Access, and Work-Family Policy”—amply supports these evaluations.

For starters, Pillard shows all the signs of a pro-abortion extremist (even as she purports to “seek[] common cause” with abortion opponents by broadening the “reproductive rights agenda with measures that make abortion less necessary” (pp. 944, 990)). In her view, “reproductive rights,” including a right to abortion, “should be doubly constitutionally protected by the overlapping liberty and equality guarantees.” A right to abortion is necessary to help to “free[] women from historically routine conscription into maternity” (p. 945 (emphasis added).)

To Pillard, men and women who oppose government mandates on employers to provide insurance coverage for contraception “reinforce[] broader patterns of discrimination against women as a class of presumptive breeders” (p. 975 (emphasis added).) Under her line of reasoning, her same charge surely applies against men and women who support restrictions on abortion (including bars on funding abortion).

Pillard objects in passing to the supposedly “deceptive images of fetus-as-autonomous-being that the anti-choice movement has popularized since the advent of amniocentesis” (p. 990). But she can’t explain what is “deceptive” about images that depict the elementary biological reality that the developing unborn baby, far from being the blob or parasite of pro-abortion mythology, is an individual human organism. (I don’t understand what Pillard means by claiming that pro-lifers present the human fetus as an “autonomous” being; I’ve never heard a pro-lifer dispute the fact that, at least until viability, the unborn baby is critically dependent on her mother for her continued survival.)

Much more to come on this law-review article.

Most Popular


What The 1619 Project Leaves Out

“The goal of The 1619 Project, a major initiative from The New York Times that this issue of the magazine inaugurates, is to reframe American history by considering what it would mean to regard 1619 as our nation’s birth year,” The New York Times Magazine editors declare. “Doing so requires us to place ... Read More

It’s Time for Colin Kaepernick to Move On

Colin Kaepernick. Remember him? Below-average quarterback. Above-average poseur. Not “activist,” not really. Activists actually say stuff. Kaepernick almost never says anything. He’s like the Queen or most popes — you have to read the deep-background musings of supposed members of his inner circle to get ... Read More
PC Culture

Courage Is the Cure for Political Correctness

This might come as some surprise to observers of our campus culture wars, but there was a time, not long ago, when the situation in American higher education was much worse. There a wave of vicious campus activism aimed at silencing heterodox speakers, and it was typically empowered by a comprehensive regime of ... Read More

Trump and the Black Vote

"Donald Trump is a racist, white supremacist, white nationalist. So are his supporters." Some version of that refrain is heard almost hourly somewhere in mainstream media. Democratic politicians seem to proclaim it more often than that. Listening only to the Left, you'd conclude that more than half a ... Read More