Bench Memos

Law & the Courts

Dispute over Use of Inadmissible Opinion Testimony for Class Certification

In a strong dissent from denial of rehearing en banc yesterday, Ninth Circuit judge Carlos Bea, joined by four of his colleagues, objected to a panel ruling (in Sali v. Corona Regional Medical Center) that, as Bea summed it up, “accepted the undisputedly inadmissible opinion of plaintiffs’ paralegal … that the plaintiffs have damages typical of the class sought to be certified.” (Emphasis in original.) Bea argues that the panel’s holding that opinion testimony need not be admissible in order to be used at the class-certification stage “is contrary to our own precedent [and] also contrary to decisions of four other circuits and clear Supreme Court guidance.”

Look for this one to get the attention of the Supreme Court if a certiorari petition is filed.

Most Popular

Culture

Gillette Is Not Wrong

Is the new Gillette razor ad a radical feminist attack on masculinity — the commercial embodiment of a woke sensibility? I was prepared to think so. But having watched it twice, I find a lot to like. The ad has been panned by some conservative commentators. With all due respect, I think they are falling into a ... Read More
PC Culture

David Webb’s White Privilege

And here I thought I was the only black man with white privilege. Areva Martin, a CNN “analyst” — whatever in hell that means anno Domini 2019 — was in the middle of a spirited exchange with the conservative talk-radio host David Webb about racial preferences in hiring. Webb argued — as ... Read More