Bench Memos

Law & the Courts

Greenhouse Gaffes

In her online piece for the New York Times today, Linda Greenhouse discusses at length Justice Alito’s recent dissent, in Ben-Levi v. Brown, from the denial of a prisoner’s petition that advanced a religious-liberty claim. I’ll limit myself to highlighting two gaffes that Greenhouse makes:

1. Greenhouse says that Alito’s opinion is “the first time in 10 years on the court that [she] can recall him ever expressing empathy with a prison inmate.” (By “expressing empathy with,” it would seem that Greenhouse really means “recognizing the legal rights of.”) But it was just last year that Alito wrote the Court’s unanimous opinion in Holt v. Hobbs holding that a Muslim prisoner had a religious-liberty right to grow a short beard. In case Greenhouse somehow couldn’t remember the Holt case, Alito’s Ben-Levi opinion discusses and relies on it.

2. As she has done before (see point 3 here), Greenhouse conflates (a) the well-settled proposition that courts have no authority to inquire into the correctness (as distinct from the sincerity) of a person’s understanding of his religion, with (b) the very different proposition that courts must defer to a person’s assertion that a governmental action substantially burdens his religious beliefs.

Greenhouse posits that Alito “is swinging for the fences” in his Ben-Levi opinion in order to influence the soon-to-be-argued HHS mandate cases (Little Sisters of the Poor and others). But there’s no “swinging for the fences” involved in setting forth the elementary proposition, recognized in the Court’s Hobby Lobby ruling two years ago (and in the Free Exercise precedents that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act incorporated), that a massive fine for declining to engage in conduct that violates a person’s sincerely held religious beliefs imposes a substantial burden on that person within the meaning of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Most Popular

PC Culture

Hate-Crime Hoaxes Reflect America’s Sickness

On January 29, tabloid news site TMZ broke the shocking story that Jussie Smollett, a gay black entertainer and progressive activist, had been viciously attacked in Chicago. Two racist white men had fractured his rib, poured bleach on him, and tied a noose around his neck. As they were leaving, they shouted ... Read More

One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders, the antique Brooklyn socialist who represents Vermont in the Senate, is not quite ready to retire to his lakeside dacha and so once again is running for the presidential nomination of a party to which he does not belong with an agenda about which he cannot be quite entirely ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Strange Paradoxes of Our Age

Modern prophets often say one thing and do another. Worse, they often advocate in the abstract as a way of justifying their doing the opposite in the concrete. The result is that contemporary culture abounds with the inexplicable — mostly because modern progressivism makes all sorts of race, class, and ... Read More
Film & TV

A Sublime Christian Masterpiece of a Film

‘There are two ways through life -- the way of nature and the way of grace,” remarks the saintly mother at the outset of The Tree of Life, one of the most awe-inspiring films of the 21st century. She continues: Grace doesn’t try please itself. It accepts being slighted, forgotten, disliked, accepts insults ... Read More

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More