Bench Memos

Law & the Courts

Greenhouse Gaffes

In her online piece for the New York Times today, Linda Greenhouse discusses at length Justice Alito’s recent dissent, in Ben-Levi v. Brown, from the denial of a prisoner’s petition that advanced a religious-liberty claim. I’ll limit myself to highlighting two gaffes that Greenhouse makes:

1. Greenhouse says that Alito’s opinion is “the first time in 10 years on the court that [she] can recall him ever expressing empathy with a prison inmate.” (By “expressing empathy with,” it would seem that Greenhouse really means “recognizing the legal rights of.”) But it was just last year that Alito wrote the Court’s unanimous opinion in Holt v. Hobbs holding that a Muslim prisoner had a religious-liberty right to grow a short beard. In case Greenhouse somehow couldn’t remember the Holt case, Alito’s Ben-Levi opinion discusses and relies on it.

2. As she has done before (see point 3 here), Greenhouse conflates (a) the well-settled proposition that courts have no authority to inquire into the correctness (as distinct from the sincerity) of a person’s understanding of his religion, with (b) the very different proposition that courts must defer to a person’s assertion that a governmental action substantially burdens his religious beliefs.

Greenhouse posits that Alito “is swinging for the fences” in his Ben-Levi opinion in order to influence the soon-to-be-argued HHS mandate cases (Little Sisters of the Poor and others). But there’s no “swinging for the fences” involved in setting forth the elementary proposition, recognized in the Court’s Hobby Lobby ruling two years ago (and in the Free Exercise precedents that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act incorporated), that a massive fine for declining to engage in conduct that violates a person’s sincerely held religious beliefs imposes a substantial burden on that person within the meaning of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Most Popular


Fire Brenda Snipes

Brenda Snipes, the supervisor of elections in Florida’s Broward County, does not deserve to be within a thousand miles of any election office anywhere in these United States. She should be fired at the earliest possible opportunity. Snipes has held her position since 2003, in which year her predecessor, ... Read More
PC Culture

The Lonely Mob

Just before the election, an Andrew Gillum intern named Shelby Shoup was arrested and charged with battery after assaulting some college Republicans on the campus of Florida State University. It was rather less exciting than that sounds: She went on a rant about “Nazis” and “fascism” — Gillum’s ... Read More

The Georgia Smear

Back in 2016, when Trump refused to say he’d necessarily accept the result if he lost, we were told that this was a terrible violation of democratic norms. Now, refusing to accept that you lost an election is the highest form of patriotism. Not only are the media and the Left not pressuring Stacey Abrams to ... Read More

How Immigration Changes Britain

Almost nothing is discussed as badly in America or Europe as the subject of immigration. And one reason is that it remains almost impossible to have any sensible or rational public discussion of its consequences. Or rather it is eminently possible to have a discussion about the upsides (“diversity,” talent, ... Read More

Sorry, Brian Kemp Still Won

Here was the state of play as of yesterday per the Kemp campaign’s breakdown of publicly available information: As of Saturday, November 10, 2018 (12:00 p.m.) *Information below is public.  Total votes reported: 3,924,658 Kemp: 1,975,162 (50.33%) Abrams: 1,912,383 (48.73%) Metz: ... Read More