Bench Memos

Hamdan’s Political Fallout

Apropos of Jonah Goldberg’s point over at The Corner, here is the AP’s Tom Raum, frequent fabulist of highly tendentious “analysis” pieces:

Politically, the [Hamdan] ruling comes at a bad time for Republicans. It puts Bush allies back on the defensive in a congressional election year over secretive war-on-terror initiatives. It could also help offset recent momentum from political progress in Iraq.

This strikes me as almost perfectly wrong. Hamdan should put the GOP on offense, and the Dems on the defensive, the more people learn about the Court’s outlandish intrusion into warfighting. If Sen. Specter is serious about legislation to undo the Court’s damage, I want to see congressional Democrats come out swinging in favor of tender solicitude toward our enemies. Then we’ll see in November, won’t we?

Matthew J. Franck — Matthew J. Franck is the Director of the William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution at the Witherspoon Institute in Princeton, New Jersey.

Most Popular

PC Culture

The New, New Anti-Semitism

The old anti-Semitism was mostly, but not exclusively, a tribal prejudice expressed in America up until the mid 20th century most intensely on the right. It manifested itself from the silk-stocking country club and corporation (“gentlemen’s agreement”) to the rawer regions of the Ku Klux Klan’s lunatic ... Read More

The Left, the Wall, the Truth

Democrats and others on the left offer three reasons for their opposition to building a wall on America's southern border. 1. A wall is ineffective. 2. A wall is too expensive. 3. A wall is immoral. Each one is false, so false as to constitute lies. So, the only question is: Do Democrats and others on ... Read More