for pro-bono moot-court work, Roberts just said, re: a Specter question on his Romer moot courting. I can handle that answer.
I probably wish he didn’t throw in that he might reconsider that routine if something were “morally objectionable” because it will be misinterpreted. But it needn’t be. As a legal friend puts it, “Romer was a case about discrimination by local governments, so you can separate the discrimination from the underlying act.”