Bench Memos

Iowa Retention Election

Three of the Iowa supreme court justices who were complicit in inventing a state constitutional right to same-sex marriage face a retention election this November. The three are chief justice Marsha K. Ternus and associate justices Michael J. Streit and David L. Baker.

According to this persuasive declaration on YouTube, Justice Streit used the recent occasion of his swearing in new attorneys to advise those attorneys that they should vote to retain him and his colleagues. Of course, it shouldn’t be a surprise that a justice who doesn’t understand the difference between judging and politicking would campaign for himself while carrying out his official duties (and wearing his judicial robe).

And, according to this article, just last week Chief Justice Ternus contended that efforts to unseat the justices were (in the article’s summary) “an attempt to intimidate judges and force the opponents’ political beliefs on the courts.” But on the matter of marriage, at least, it is the Iowa justices who have forced their political beliefs on the people of Iowa—in the guise of construing the state constitution, no less. It is the opponents of that ruling who recognize that the question of redefining marriage to include same-sex couples is a matter to be addressed through the democratic processes—processes that don’t guarantee victory for, or otherwise impose, anyone’s political beliefs. 

This, of course, is on top of Justice O’Connor’s unseemly involvement in the retention-election campaign, all at a time when she regards herself, rightly or wrongly, as continuing to be a sitting federal judge in senior status.

If Iowans take seriously their responsibilities as citizens, they ought to throw the rascals out.

Update—A reader who is a proud Hawkeye comments:

Someone needs to tell Chief Justice Ternus that, of same-sex marriage and judicial retention elections, one of the two was actually put into the Iowa Constitution by the Iowan people.  And it’s not same-sex marriage.

Ternus is a stronger proponent of what’s not in the Iowa Constitution than of what is in it!

Most Popular

Elections

A Hard Look at Those Post-Election Legal Efforts

On the menu today: Michigan certifies its vote totals; the General Services Administration starts the transition; and it’s time for a hard, unflinching look at the president’s post-election legal efforts. What Did the President Get from His Legal Team? Michigan and Georgia have certified their election ... Read More
Elections

A Hard Look at Those Post-Election Legal Efforts

On the menu today: Michigan certifies its vote totals; the General Services Administration starts the transition; and it’s time for a hard, unflinching look at the president’s post-election legal efforts. What Did the President Get from His Legal Team? Michigan and Georgia have certified their election ... Read More
History

From Hate to Heroism

Welcome to “The Tuesday,” a weekly newsletter about language, culture, politics, and, lately, relentless book-hawking. To subscribe to “The Tuesday” and receive it in your inbox, please follow this link. From Hatred to Heroism Daniel Cordier, when he was young and getting started in life, did not seem ... Read More
History

From Hate to Heroism

Welcome to “The Tuesday,” a weekly newsletter about language, culture, politics, and, lately, relentless book-hawking. To subscribe to “The Tuesday” and receive it in your inbox, please follow this link. From Hatred to Heroism Daniel Cordier, when he was young and getting started in life, did not seem ... Read More
Elections

It’s Only ‘Free and Fair’ When We Win

Indeed, this is astonishing: https://twitter.com/felixsalmon/status/1331295033325219840 In 2018, after two years of media spinning tales about shady Russian infiltrators in our government, 67 percent of Democrats believed that Putin’s gremlins had bored into our voting machines and altered the outcome ... Read More
Elections

It’s Only ‘Free and Fair’ When We Win

Indeed, this is astonishing: https://twitter.com/felixsalmon/status/1331295033325219840 In 2018, after two years of media spinning tales about shady Russian infiltrators in our government, 67 percent of Democrats believed that Putin’s gremlins had bored into our voting machines and altered the outcome ... Read More

The Coup That Wasn’t

Donald Trump is not done challenging the results of the 2020 election in court, and he is by no means done complaining. But there will be no “coup.” Any prospect of Trump remaining in office without a legal process that declares him the recipient of more legal votes in the decisive states has now evaporated. ... Read More

The Coup That Wasn’t

Donald Trump is not done challenging the results of the 2020 election in court, and he is by no means done complaining. But there will be no “coup.” Any prospect of Trump remaining in office without a legal process that declares him the recipient of more legal votes in the decisive states has now evaporated. ... Read More