Bench Memos

Law & the Courts

Fishy Panel Assignments in North Carolina Election Cases?

A couple of years ago, I highlighted irregularities in Ninth Circuit panel assignments. I’ve now discovered the anomaly that Fourth Circuit judge James A. Wynn Jr. has been assigned to four of five recent cases involving challenges to North Carolina election laws.* Indeed, three of those five cases (including two to which Wynn has been assigned) have been three-judge district court panels, constituted under 28 U.S.C. § 2284, that have had only one Fourth Circuit judge on them.

That might seem amazing good fortune for Wynn, an African American from North Carolina who, according to this account, had “a long history of partisan political activity in North Carolina.” That history includes “a close working relationship” with Rev. William Barber, president of the North Carolina NAACP, which was a plaintiff in one of the cases.

But maybe luck has little or nothing to do with it. By its terms, section 2284 provides only that the “chief judge of the circuit … shall designate” the circuit judge (or circuit judges) to sit on the three-judge district court panel.

William B. Traxler Jr. was the Fourth Circuit’s chief judge from 2009 until July of this year, and Roger L. Gregory has been chief judge since that time. So my open question for former chief judge Traxler and current chief judge Gregory is:

In exercising your authority under section 2284 to designate a circuit judge to sit on a three-judge district court panel, what method do you use to select the judge you will designate?

Be assured that I will happily post in full any responses you provide me, just as I did when Seventh Circuit chief judge Diane Wood and former chief judge Frank Easterbrook responded to my questions about motions panels.

* Those cases are Covington v. North Carolina (M.D.N.C. 2016); North Carolina State Conference of NAACP v. McCrory (CA4 2016); Raleigh Wake Citizens Ass’n v. Wake County Board of Elections (CA4 2016); Common Cause v. Rucho (pending in M.D.N.C., as is League of Women Voters v. Rucho—both cases have the same panel and are so closely related that I am counting them only as one); and Harris v. McCrory (M.D.N.C. 2016).

Most Popular

Energy & Environment

The Climate Trap for Democrats

The more the climate debate changes, the more it stays the same. Polls show that the public is worried about climate change, but that doesn’t mean that it is any more ready to bear any burden or pay any price to combat it. If President Donald Trump claws his way to victory again in Pennsylvania and the ... Read More

Kamala Harris Runs for Queen

I’m going to let you in on a secret about the 2020 presidential contest: Unless unforeseen circumstances lead to a true wave election, the legislative stakes will be extremely low. The odds are heavily stacked against Democrats’ retaking the Senate, and that means that even if a Democrat wins the White House, ... Read More

What We’ve Learned about Jussie Smollett

It’s been a few weeks since March 26, when all charges against Jussie Smollett were dropped and the actor declared that his version of events had been proven correct. How’s that going? Smollett’s celebrity defenders have gone quiet. His publicists and lawyers are dodging reporters. The @StandwithJussie ... Read More
Politics & Policy

But Why Is Guatemala Hungry?

I really, really don’t want to be on the “Nicolas Kristof Wrote Something Dumb” beat, but, Jiminy Cricket! Kristof has taken a trip to Guatemala, with a young woman from Arizona State University in tow. “My annual win-a-trip journey,” he writes. Reporting from Guatemala, he discovers that many ... Read More