Bench Memos

Jeffrey Rosen on Diane Wood

After raising concerns that Sonia Sotomayor just isn’t smart enough for the job, the New Republic’s Jeffrey Rosen touts Seventh Circuit judge Diane Wood as a great pick.  I’m thoroughly unpersuaded. 

Rosen’s case rests almost entirely on praise from three of Wood’s academic colleagues at the University of Chicago—Martha Nussbaum, Richard Epstein, and Geoffrey Stone.  Legal academics are prodigal in heaping undeserved praise on each other, and Stone’s praise in particular—“very careful,” “respectful of precedent,” “a craftsperson,” “not in any way result-oriented”—ought to be regarded as a contraindicator of quality, given how wild his rantings are (see, for example, here, here and here, including links within those posts). 

Epstein’s assertion that “lawyers who appear before [Wood] know that they will get a respectful hearing” is, alas, belied by the evidence.  As for his assertion that Wood is “nondogmatic”:  On issues relating to abortion—to take just one example—I doubt that there is a more dogmatic and willfully lawless judge in the country:  Her defiance of the Supreme Court’s mandate in NOW v. Scheidler (and her incurring successive 8-1 and 8-0 reversals by the Court) ought alone to be disqualifying.  In addition, Wood has (in dissent) voted to strike down state laws banning partial-birth abortion and voted to strike down an Indiana informed-consent law that was in all material respects identical to the law upheld by the Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

Rosen is a big admirer of Justice Ginsburg, who, he asserts parenthetically, “of course … has surpassed [his own very high] expectations” for her.  The subheadline of Rosen’s piece calls Wood “the second coming of Ruth Bader Ginsburg,” and Rosen identifies Wood as the Supreme Court candidate whose “moderate, incremental liberalism most resemble Ginsburg’s.”  For those of us who assess Ginsburg very differently—and for the many Republican senators and conservative judges who somehow expected Ginsburg to be much better than she has proven to be—that comparison ought to be more warning than comfort.

Most Popular

White House

For Democrats, the Party’s Over

If the Democrats are really tempted by impeachment, bring it on. Since the day after the 2016 election they have been threatening this, placing their chips on the Russian-collusion fantasy and then on the phantasmagoric charade of obstruction of justice. The attorney general accurately gave the ingredients of the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Worst Cover-Up of All Time

President Donald Trump may be guilty of many things, but a cover-up in the Mueller probe isn’t one of them. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, attempting to appease forces in the Democratic party eager for impeachment, is accusing him of one, with all the familiar Watergate connotations. The charge is strange, ... Read More
PC Culture

TV Before PC

Affixing one’s glance to the rear-view mirror is usually as ill-advised as staring at one’s own reflection. Still, what a delight it was on Wednesday to see a fresh rendition of “Those Were the Days,” from All in the Family, a show I haven’t watched for nearly 40 years. This time it was Woody Harrelson ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Democrats’ Other Class War

There is a class war going on inside the Democratic party. Consider these two cris de couer: Writing in the New York Times under the headline “America’s Cities Are Unlivable — Blame Wealthy Liberals,” Farhad Manjoo argues that rich progressives have, through their political domination of cities such as ... Read More

The Deepfake of Nancy Pelosi

You’ve almost made it to a three-day weekend! Making the click-through worthwhile: A quick note about how National Review needs your help, concerns about “deepfakes” of Nancy Pelosi, one of the most cringe-inducing radio interviews of all time, some news about where to find me and the book in the near ... Read More