Bench Memos

Unfit for Pedagogy?

A cartoonish leftist tract masquerades as legal scholarship.

The leadership of Chief Justice John Roberts has disappointed many conservatives, especially his strained opinions upholding Obamacare, in NFIB v. Sebelius (2012) and King v. Burwell (2015). Presidential candidate Senator Ted Cruz (R., Texas), who supported Roberts’s nomination, now says that his appointment was a mistake. It is ironic, therefore, that Albany Law School professor Stephen Gottlieb has written a book-length critique of the Roberts Court, from the Left. Gottlieb’s book, Unfit for Democracy: The Roberts Court and the Breakdown of American Politics (NYU Press 2016), is a tendentious diatribe that excoriates the Roberts Court (even some unanimous decisions and opinions written by the Court’s liberal members) for particular results that do not comport with Gottlieb’s left-wing policy preferences.

If the book were written as a candid political manifesto, Gottlieb’s thesis would at least have the virtue of intellectual honesty. Unfortunately, he uses pseudo-academic jargon to present his critique as an exercise in “political science” and “constitutional theory.” Gottlieb contends that, properly understood, the legitimacy of the Constitution depends on outcomes that promote “democracy” (which he defines as progressive results) and lead to “contemporary justice” (ditto). Voila, the Court needs to return to New Deal era jurisprudence (in particular footnote 4 to United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938)). Deviation from this path, he warns, “leaves us defenseless against the enemy within.” Sadly, such dreck passes as scholarship in today’s legal academy.

I review Gottlieb’s book for the Library of Law and Liberty, in a post entitled Misfiring on the Roberts Court. I am critical of the $55 (!) book, which is truly dreadful, but also question the judgment of the publisher. My review ends with this question: “What were the editors of New York University Press thinking?”

Most Popular

White House

The Impeachment Clock

Adam Schiff’s impeachment inquiry is incoherent. Given the impossibility of a senatorial conviction, the only strategy is to taint the president with the brand of impeachment and weaken him in the 2020 election. Yet Schiff seems to have no sense that the worm has already turned. Far from tormenting Trump and ... Read More
Economy & Business

Who Owns FedEx?

You may have seen (or heard on a podcast) that Fred Smith so vehemently objects to the New York Times report contending that FedEx paid nothing in federal taxes that he's challenged New York Times publisher A. G. Sulzberger to a public debate and pointed out that "the New York Times paid zero federal income tax ... Read More
Immigration

The ‘Welfare Magnet’ for Immigrants

That term refers to a controversial concept -- and a salient one, given the Trump administration's efforts to make it harder for immigrants to use welfare in the U.S. A new study finds that there's something to it: Immigrants were more likely to come to Denmark when they could get more welfare there. From the ... Read More