Bench Memos

Justice Ginsburg’s Political Activism

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that an individual wishing to challenge an employment practice file a charge with the EEOC within 180 days (or, in some cases, within 300 days) “after the alleged unlawful employment practice occurred.”  An individual who fails to submit an EEOC charge within the charging period may not challenge the employment practice in court.


In yesterday’s ruling in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., the Supreme Court ruled, by a vote of 5 to 4, that a pay-discrimination claim under Title VII cannot be based on the continuing effects of allegedly discriminatory acts that occurred outside the charging period.  Justice Alito’s majority opinion concluded that four Supreme Court precedents “squarely foreclosed” that argument.  Justice Ginsburg, in dissent, offered a different reading of the applicable precedents.


I’m not going to parse the arguments and counter-arguments here.  I instead want to highlight Ginsburg’s remarkable invitation to Congress “to correct this Court’s parsimonious reading of Title VII.”  More precisely, at the end of her dissent, after citing previous instances in which Congress has responded to the Court’s supposedly “cramped interpretation[s]” of Title VII by enacting legislative amendments, Ginsburg writes:  “Once again, the ball is in Congress’ court.  As in 1991, the Legislature may act to correct this parsimonious reading of Title VII.”


One might contend that Ginsburg is not in fact inviting Congress to act, but rather that she is merely noting that Congress “may act”.  Given Ginsburg’s assertion that “the ball is in Congress’ court” and her clear view that the Court’s “parsimonious” reading warrants “correct[ion]”, that would be slicing the salami very thin.  Indeed, the newspapers have accorded Ginsburg’s statement its natural meaning.  The Washington Post, for example, states that Ginsburg “called for Congress to correct what she sees as the court’s mistake.”  And the New York Times states that Ginsburg “invited Congress to overturn the decision” (and that “[w]ithin hours” Hillary Clinton “announced her intention to submit such a bill”).


What business is it of Ginsburg’s to invite Congress to legislate on a matter, much less to legislate in a certain way?  I suppose that it’s no wonder that a justice who can’t separate judging from politics—and whose decisionmaking routinely indulges and entrenches her own political preferences—would see no reason to refrain from advising Congress how to carry out its legislative function. 

Most Popular


Responsibility and Blame

David L. Bahnsen has written a book on themes dear to my heart. It’s called “Crisis of Responsibility: Our Cultural Addiction to Blame and How You Can Cure It.” I have done a Q&A with the author, here. Thinking about his book, I remembered a few things — and shared them with David in our podcast. ... Read More

Monday Links

The Guy Who Makes the World’s Best Paper Airplanes. The Theater That Shakespeare Stole. The Invention of the Baby Carrot Phrases commonly used today which are derived from obsolete technologies. This device was used to resuscitate canaries in coal mines. The Surprisingly Complex Design of the ... Read More

Richard Pipes, Historian of Totalitarianism

‘My subject is the Russian Revolution, arguably the most important event of the twentieth century. It is my considered judgment that, had it not been for the Russian Revolution, there would very likely have been no National Socialism; probably no Second World War and no decolonization; and certainly no Cold ... Read More

School Shootings and the Incentives of Violence

Today’s Morning Jolt discusses school shootings and the common difficulties of the teenage years, and I thought of another aspect that I forgot to include -- the degree to which our society, in its reaction to violence, inadvertently rewards that violence. Every teenager wants attention, to be recognized, to ... Read More
NR Marketing

Down the Home Stretch

Our Spring 2018 Webathon winds up this week. El jefe, Mr. Lowry, makes the case, wonderfully, for your participating, even at this final stage. In case you need some visual inspiration, we’ll use this horse race image from the novel Ben Hur (you'll remember the 1959 movie version starred the late NR ... Read More