Bench Memos

A Less ‘Politicized’ Judiciary? Hardly

Rasmussen just came out with a poll showing that a plurality of voters think the courts are too liberal — 38 percent, compared to 18 percent who think they are too conservative. So for all the harping on Citizens United and the distortion of Ledbetter and other recent Supreme Court cases, the voters aren’t convinced.

Even more interesting is the poll’s finding that 65 percent of likely voters would rather elect their own judges than have them appointed by others. Could it be that the voters intuitively know what Brian Fitzpatrick has identified in a Missouri Law Review article, that there are good reasons to be concerned that judges nominated by lawyer-dominated committees will ultimately be well to the ideological left of the electorate?

Fitzpatrick’s data from Tennessee and Missouri — two states that follow the “Missouri Plan” for appointment of judges — undermines the claim of that system’s defenders that their process is non-partisan. In Tennessee, his data showed that 67 percent of appellate nominees had voted in Democratic primaries, compared to only 33 percent in Republican primaries, even though the state’s voters were split evenly between the two parties. In Missouri, the data were even more stark: For the nominees for whom campaign donation data was available, 87 percent donated primarily to Democrats, while only 13 percent gave primarily to Republicans. The amount of money contributed by judicial nominees was skewed 93 percent to Democrats and only 7 percent to Republicans. Again, this is in a state where the voters themselves were split nearly 50/50 over the same time period, so elected judges would have almost certainly produced less leftist courts.

The failure of the judicial appointment process to produce what its advocates promised — a less “politicized” judiciary — is leading to backlash in Iowa, Missouri, Colorado, and Kansas, and the movement is spreading to other states. Watch out, George Soros, the American people are becoming more and more skeptical of delegating their own inherent power of self-government, and would rather take back that power than hand it over to a committee of lawyers.

Carrie Severino — Carrie Severino is chief counsel and policy director to the Judicial Crisis Network.

Most Popular



For your amusement, I hope, I’ve done a Jaywalking episode. It begins with a bit of the overture to Semiramide -- a Rossini opera I reviewed from the Met last week. Then I get into Russia and, after a while, China. The Marriott company fired an employee for “liking” a tweet by a Tibetan independence group. ... Read More

Viva l’Italia?

Italy has just had elections, with very interesting results. I wanted to talk with Alberto Mingardi, which I have. He is one of the leading classical liberals in Italy -- the director general of the Bruno Leoni Institute, in Milan. (Mingardi himself is Milanese.) He is also an authority in arts and letters. In ... Read More

Putin and the Cult of Leadership

On Sunday, Russian dictator Vladimir Putin won an unsurprising reelection-campaign victory against Communist Party candidate Pavel Grudinin, by a margin of 76.7 percent to 11.8 percent. The results were unsurprising because Putin is a tyrant who murders or imprisons political rivals, and who isn’t afraid to use ... Read More

Trump and Brexit Derangement Syndrome

I am not one of those Brexiteers who believe that Brexit and Trumpism are essentially the same phenomenon in two different countries. To be sure, they both draw on some of the same political trends, notably a distrust of elites and an upsurge of popular anger over evident failures of public policy such as illegal ... Read More