Bench Memos

Matt Franck on the SSM Debate

In his Public Discourse essay today, Matt Franck praises Debating Same-Sex Marriage—a new book co-authored by SSM proponent John Corvino and SSM opponent Maggie Gallagher—for “provid[ing] what are probably the best and the most complete arguments on either side of this momentous debate.”

Matt’s own powerful review (drawing on Gallagher’s arguments) provides a clear and succinct account of what is at stake: Whereas traditional marriage is the “institutional solution” to the “social problems” of how to civilize the children that heterosexual intercourse naturally generates, marriage for same-sex couples is “a solution in search of a problem.”

Worse, same-sex marriage “promises to create all sorts of new problems” for the “wounded institution” of marriage—divorcing it further from its mission of responsible procreation and from the supportive norms of fidelity, exclusivity, and permanence.

Further, building on Corvino’s own concessions, Matt explains: “A future in which same-sex marriage is enshrined in the law is a future without meaningful religious liberty, freedom of speech, or economic freedom for millions of Americans.”

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Did Flynn Lie?

At the outset, let’s get two things straight: First, there is something deeply disturbing about the Obama administration’s decision to open a counterintelligence investigation on retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn while he was working on the Trump campaign — and, ultimately, about the Justice ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Where Is the Flynn 302?

Better late than never (I hope), my weekend column has posted on the website. It deals with the question whether General Michael Flynn actually lied to the FBI agents — including the now infamous Peter Strzok — when they interviewed him in the White House on his third day on the job as national security ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Who’s in Charge Here?

In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump was asked on many occasions whether he would “accept the results” of the election if he were to lose. Democrats and their media allies demanded that he make a solemn vow to “accept the results.” It was never entirely clear what anybody thought ... Read More