Bench Memos

More on the Oregon Case

On the surface, I agree that Justice Scalia’s dissent presents a more compelling interpretation of the Controlled Substances Act than does Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion. In my view, this says more about Kennedy’s opinion than it does the underlying merits. I believe the Court decided the assisted-suicide case correctly because I believe that the so-called clear statement rule – the rule that Courts will not find that a statute displaces states from areas of traditional state concern without a “clear statement” to that effect from Congress – tips the balance in favor of Oregon’s claim. For whatever reason, the majority did not place too much weight on this argument, and chose to rest the holding on the CSA and a narrow interpretation of various administrative law doctrines instead. Perhaps this was because some of those in the majority did not want to place a greater emphasis on federalism principles. I don’t know. But this is hardly the first case in which I believe the Court reached the right legal result without doing so in the best or most persuasive fashion.

Jonathan H. Adler — Jonathan H. Adler teaches courses in environmental, administrative, and constitutional law at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law.

Most Popular


Microscopic Dots. Let’s Look at Them.

Stuart E. Eizenstat has written a big book on the Carter presidency. (Eizenstat was Carter’s chief domestic-policy adviser. He also had a substantial hand in foreign affairs.) I have reviewed the book for the forthcoming NR. Eizenstat tells the story of a meeting between President Carter and Andrei Gromyko, the ... Read More

Why North Korea Isn’t Going to Give Up Its Nukes

Responding to reports that North Korea said it “no longer needs” nuclear tests, Jim Hanson, president of the generally pro-Trump Security Studies Group, credited President Trump. “No one was expecting anything to come of Trump’s fiery rhetoric, except people who understand that diplomacy works better ... Read More