Bench Memos

NYT Editorialist Lincoln Caplan’s “Accountability Avoidance”?—NYT Response

On Friday, I forwarded to Arthur Brisbane, the “public editor” (or ombudsman) of the New York Times, my questions about Lincoln Caplan’s role, if any, in the house editorials about decisions of the court on which his wife, Judge Susan Carney, sits, and I have received this response today:

I queried Andrew Rosenthal [the editorial-page editor] on the matter you raised concerning Lincoln Caplan. Here is what he had to say: “We discussed this issue when Linc joined our board and we put in place ways to avoid the problem. I have no intention of discussing the authorship of any editorial. But there were no conflicts in these editorials.”

Rosenthal’s response amounts to little more than “trust me.” My specific questions asked whether Caplan “draft[ed] … or play[ed] any role in reviewing” two editorials. Rosenthal doesn’t directly answer my questions. His assertion that “there were no conflicts in these editorials” might be read to imply that his answer is no. But it’s certainly also possible that he is simply offering his bottom-line assessment that Caplan’s role (whatever it was) didn’t create a conflict, perhaps because in his judgment the unspecified “ways” that were “put in place … to avoid the problem” by definition eliminated any conflict.

Too bad that Rosenthal wouldn’t bother to say what “ways” were “put in place.” So much for transparency.

Most Popular


The Democrats Made Two Joe Biden Miscalculations

I think it's safe to say that there are many, many progressive Democrats who are more than a little surprised -- and a lot chagrined -- at Joe Biden's polling dominance. Look at FiveThirtyEight's polling roundup. Aside from a few high and low outliers, he leads the race by a solid 20 points (at least). Even ... Read More

Our Modern Satyricon

Sometime around a.d. 60, in the age of Emperor Nero, a Roman court insider named Gaius Petronius wrote a satirical Latin novel, The Satyricon, about moral corruption in Imperial Rome. The novel’s general landscape was Rome’s transition from an agrarian republic to a globalized multicultural ... Read More