Bench Memos

The Perennial Publius, part 28

With a realism rare in one so young (he was only 32 in 1787), but well-earned by both experience and study, Alexander Hamilton writes in Federalist No. 28 that “seditions and insurrections are unhappily maladies as inseparable from the body politic, as tumours and eruptions from the natural body.”  When they occur, “[t]he means to be employed must be proportioned to the extent of the mischief”—reason enough for a standing army of some extent.  He may have had in mind Shays’ Rebellion in Massachusetts the previous year, but with our own hindsight on history it is hard not to think (again) of the Civil War.  Hamilton does not seem to have foreseen that great breach in the Union along sectional lines.  Instead, his worst-case scenario is some form of general struggle between the states on one side and the federal government on the other, with opposing claims of “usurpation” flung by each at the other.  In that case, “[t]he people, by throwing themselves into either scale, will infallibly make it preponderate.”

 

Or is that the worst case?  Just a moment earlier, Hamilton recalls the ground of all government in the natural rights of the people, echoing the Declaration of Independence:

 

“If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defence, which is paramount to all positive forms of government . . .”

 

As Harry V. Jaffa has pointed out in A New Birth of Freedom, his profound book on Lincoln and the coming of the Civil War (see my review here), it was this nettle that the secessionists refused to grasp.  They claimed a constitutional right to secede, not a natural right of revolution, because under the influence of Calhoun they had ceased to believe in natural rights antecedent to “positive forms of government”—and because they could not make such a natural-rights argument without calling to mind the slaves, the violation of whose natural rights was the sine qua non of their new “confederacy.”

 

Lincoln and Hamilton are as one: an authentic American conservatism is a natural-rights conservatism.

 

(For explanation of this recurring feature, see here.)

 

Matthew J. Franck — Matthew J. Franck is the Director of the William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution at the Witherspoon Institute in Princeton, New Jersey.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

‘Judges for the #Resistance’

At Politico, I wrote today about the judiciary’s activism against Trump on immigration: There is a lawlessness rampant in the land, but it isn’t emanating from the Trump administration. The source is the federal judges who are making a mockery of their profession by twisting the law to block the Trump ... Read More
White House

Trump’s Friendships Are America’s Asset

The stale, clichéd conceptions of Donald Trump held by both Left and Right — a man either utterly useless or only rigidly, transactionally tolerable — conceal the fact that the president does possess redeeming talents that are uniquely his, and deserve praise on their own merit. One is personal friendliness ... Read More
U.S.

Columbia 1968: Another Untold Story

Fifty years ago this week, Columbia students riding the combined wave of the civil-rights and anti-war movements went on strike, occupied buildings across campus, and shut the university down. As you revisit that episode of the larger drama that was the annus horribilis 1968, bear in mind that the past isn’t ... Read More
Culture

Only the Strident Survive

‘I am not prone to anxiety,” historian Niall Ferguson wrote in the Times of London on April 22. “Last week, however, for the first time since I went through the emotional trauma of divorce, I experienced an uncontrollable panic attack.” The cause? “A few intemperate emails, inadvertently forwarded ... Read More