Bench Memos

The Power to ‘Nominate’ Is Not the Power to ‘Appoint’

Senate Republicans, to their credit, have with one voice been emphasizing the importance of letting the voters in November determine who will fill Justice Scalia’s seat. 

Cue the straw men.

Contrary to questions asked of the presidential nominees on Saturday, nobody is claiming that the President has no authority to nominate Supreme Court Justices.  The president has every right to nominate the candidate of his choice.  But “nomination” doesn’t mean the same thing as “appointment.”

Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution says the following about the President’s power over judicial nominations (italics added):

. . . [H]e shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint . . . judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law[.]

Sure, it would be nice if President Obama agreed it would be best for the country to allow the American people to choose who shapes the direction of the Court.  But I don’t think anyone really thinks he will take the high road, even if it means letting a Democratic successor have that opportunity.

All Republican senators are saying is this: If the President does nominate someone, the Senators will take their own constitutional duty seriously.  Contra Elizabeth Warren, there is no constitutional provision requiring Republican Senators to fall in line behind whoever the President nominates.  Each of them has taken an oath to the Constitution and must not confirm someone who would rubber stamp this president’s lawless agenda.

Carrie Severino is chief counsel and policy director to the Judicial Crisis Network.

Most Popular


Cold Brew’s Insidious Hegemony

Soon, many parts of the United States will be unbearably hot. Texans and Arizonans will be able to bake cookies on their car dashboards; the garbage on the streets of New York will be especially pungent; Washington will not only figuratively be a swamp. And all across America, coffee consumers will turn their ... Read More

Australia’s Voters Reject Leftist Ideas

Hell hath no fury greater than left-wingers who lose an election in a surprise upset. Think Brexit in 2016. Think Trump’s victory the same year. Now add Australia. Conservative prime minister Scott Morrison shocked pollsters and pundits alike with his victory on Saturday, and the reaction has been brutal ... Read More
National Security & Defense

The Warmonger Canard

Whatever the opposite of a rush to war is — a crawl to peace, maybe — America is in the middle of one. Since May 5, when John Bolton announced the accelerated deployment of the Abraham Lincoln carrier group to the Persian Gulf in response to intelligence of a possible Iranian attack, the press has been aflame ... Read More
NR Webathon

We’ve Had Bill Barr’s Back

One of the more dismaying features of the national political debate lately is how casually and cynically Attorney General Bill Barr has been smeared. He is routinely compared to Roy Cohn on a cable-TV program that prides itself on assembling the most thoughtful and plugged-in political analysts and ... Read More
Film & TV

Game of Thrones: A Father’s Legacy Endures

Warning! If you don't want to read any spoilers from last night's series finale of Game of Thrones, stop reading. Right now. There is a lot to unpack about the Thrones finale, and I fully understand many of the criticisms I read on Twitter and elsewhere. Yes, the show was compressed. Yes, there were moments ... Read More