Bench Memos

Punishing a Lawyer for His Clients

Q.  When is it okay to punish a lawyer for the clients he’s represented?

A.  When the clients are disfavored by the Left.

That, at least, would seem to be the lesson to be drawn from the apparent demise of Sri Srinivasan’s planned nomination to the D.C. Circuit.  According to reliable sources, the White House had settled on Srinivasan to fill one of the two vacancies on the D.C. Circuit.  (Both of the vacancies predate President Obama’s inauguration; indeed, the older one is the seat John Roberts vacated in 2005 to become Chief Justice.)  But the Left then went after Srinivasan, in part because of union animosity to his corporate clients in private practice, in part because, in his former capacity as an assistant to the Solicitor General, Srinivasan advocated the positions of the Bush administration on Guantanamo  war-on-terror detainee issues.  And the prospect of Srinivasan’s getting the nomination now appears to be dead.

(I don’t mean by this post to be seen as taking the position that it’s never proper to draw inferences about a lawyer based on the clients he represents.  That is in fact not my position.  For present purposes, I’ll limit myself to the general observation that of the three areas of government practice, paid private practice, and pro bono practice, the areas that least justify the drawing of inferences about a lawyer based on his clients are government practice and paid private practice.)

Most Popular

Education

Betsy DeVos Strikes a Blow for the Constitution

The Department of Education has issued its long-awaited proposed regulations reforming sexual-assault adjudications on college campus. Not only will these rules restore basic due process and fairness to college tribunals, but they also — given how basic the changes are — highlight just how ridiculous ... Read More
Politics & Policy

ABC News Makes a Serious Mistake

Today, across Twitter, I began to see a number of people condemning the Trump administration (and Betsy DeVos, specifically) for imposing a new definition of sexual assault on campus so strict that it would force women to prove that they were so harassed that they'd been chased off campus and couldn't return. ... Read More