Bench Memos

Re: Another Reckless NY Times Editorial

Over at People for the American Way’s blog, the blogger “Kyle” takes issue with my criticism of the New York Times editorial in two respects. 

 

First, Kyle imagines that the Senate Republicans’ letter isn’t “really about ‘blue-slip privileges” because “it makes no mention of blue-slip policy at all.”  It is true that the letter, intended for general consumption as well as for President Obama, doesn’t use a technical term that many readers wouldn’t understand.  But its second proposed step is clearly about the blue-slip privilege, as I explain here and as the New York Times editorial fully recognizes.  (Hint to Kyle:  That’s why the editorial discusses the blue-slip privilege.)

 

Second, Kyle maintains that the blue-slip policy changed dramatically from the time that Senator Leahy was chairman of the Judiciary Committee (2001-2002) to the time that Senator Hatch was chairman (2003-2004).  He specifically contends that Hatch “ignor[ed] the blue-slip policy altogether when it served the GOP’s interests”.  The entirety of his evidence:  Hatch held hearings on two nominees who hadn’t received favorable blue slips.  Kyle fails to mention that Democrats filibustered both nominees to keep them from being confirmed.  He also fails to mention that the policy during Senator Specter’s period as chairman (2005-2006) was the same as under Senator Leahy. 

 

I will acknowledge that this sentence in my post was imprecise (in light of Hatch’s two hearings):  “All that Senate Republicans are seeking is maintenance of the same blue-slip practice that they afforded Democrats under President Bush.”  I should have written:  “All that Senate Republicans are seeking is maintenance of the same blue-slip practice that Democrats successfully insisted on under President Bush.”  (And I’ll reword it right now.)

Most Popular

Education

Husband of Sen. Dianne Feinstein Admits to Helping Well-Connected Applicants Gain Admission to University of California: ‘No One Ever Told Me It Was Wrong’

The husband of Senator Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.) admitted on Thursday to sending an inappropriate letter identified in a state audit that appeared to help an applicant to the University of California, Berkeley, get accepted to the school. The California State Auditor issued a scathing report on Tuesday ... Read More
Education

Husband of Sen. Dianne Feinstein Admits to Helping Well-Connected Applicants Gain Admission to University of California: ‘No One Ever Told Me It Was Wrong’

The husband of Senator Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.) admitted on Thursday to sending an inappropriate letter identified in a state audit that appeared to help an applicant to the University of California, Berkeley, get accepted to the school. The California State Auditor issued a scathing report on Tuesday ... Read More

The Arson Party

About that peaceful transfer of power . . . I do not have access to my friend Mario Loyola’s Donald J. Trump super-secret decoder ring, but I am inclined to accept Loyola’s explanation that what President Trump was trying to say, but couldn’t quite manage to say, was the usual witless Trump trolling -- ... Read More

The Arson Party

About that peaceful transfer of power . . . I do not have access to my friend Mario Loyola’s Donald J. Trump super-secret decoder ring, but I am inclined to accept Loyola’s explanation that what President Trump was trying to say, but couldn’t quite manage to say, was the usual witless Trump trolling -- ... Read More
Law & the Courts

No, the Democrats Won’t Pack the Court

For many progressive opinion-makers, the only way to save the Supreme Court is to destroy it.   They believe the best response to the Republican-held Senate confirming a Trump nominee to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat on the Supreme Court is to pack the Court if Democrats win in November. Holding out the ... Read More
Law & the Courts

No, the Democrats Won’t Pack the Court

For many progressive opinion-makers, the only way to save the Supreme Court is to destroy it.   They believe the best response to the Republican-held Senate confirming a Trump nominee to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat on the Supreme Court is to pack the Court if Democrats win in November. Holding out the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Do You Want 51 or 52 States Next Year?

“The prospects of statehood for Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., have never been greater, but many significant obstacles loom,” The Hill declares. The Constitution declares, “new States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Do You Want 51 or 52 States Next Year?

“The prospects of statehood for Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., have never been greater, but many significant obstacles loom,” The Hill declares. The Constitution declares, “new States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction ... Read More