Bench Memos

Response to Hit Pieces on Scalia — Part 6

I’ve focused much more extensively on Adam Cohen’s recent hit piece on Scalia” (TimesSelect subscription required) than on Kenneth Jost’s similar attack in CQ Weekly.  But Jost’s attack is in many respects even more reckless.  Whereas Cohen at least tried to substantiate his charges, Jost uses the distorted factual assertions in his first two paragraphs (to which my responses to Cohen also apply) as a platform for a broader diatribe against Scalia. 


Let me respond briefly to several parts of that broader diatribe:


1.  Jost begins by asserting that conservatives love Scalia because Scalia “just loves to stick it to the liberals.”  Ah, yes:  me caveman like see Scalia bash commie heads.  Surely it couldn’t be that we conservatives admire Scalia’s powerful exposition of a jurisprudence of original meaning, his sparkling prose, his logical rigor—and his passionate commitment to American principles of political philosophy.

2.  Clipping isolated snippets from Scalia’s extended arguments (and displaying the very quality he purports to decry), Jost mischaracterizes Scalia’s dissents as being “as much vituperation as cerebration.”  He mislabels as “personal attacks” Scalia’s devastating critiques of opposing arguments, and credits other justices for their woeful failure even to respond to those critiques.  And, without assessing the merits of the competing positions, Jost faults Scalia for often being in dissent.  (Oddly, despite being the “Supreme Court editor for CQ Press,” Jost doesn’t know the difference between the “original meaning” and “original intent” species of originalism and mistakenly attributes the latter to Scalia.) 

3.  In addition to his snide subtitle—“Scalia v. Dignity”—Jost asserts that the “irreconcilable right wing cares little for the dignity of the court.”  I’m not sure what Jost expects the “right wing” to reconcile itself to—the Supreme Court’s unconstitutional power grabs, evidently.  Sorry, but we conservatives are faithful to the real Constitution and to the system of representative government that it established.  We care deeply about the genuine dignity of the Supreme Court, but we believe that the Court earns dignity when justices decide cases correctly—and imperils it when they don’t (and especially when they usurp power).  And we recognize that no recent justice has done more to advance the genuine dignity of the Supreme Court than Scalia.  

(I think that I’m now done with Cohen and Jost.  The previous posts in this series are here, here, here, here, and here.) 

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Building a National American Conservatism

It seems like just yesterday that I undertook my first campaign for public office. I knocked on virtually every door in the small city of West Miami in my bid to be elected to its city commission. It was during that campaign, on the front porches and in the living rooms of the families I would ultimately ... Read More

Confirm Pompeo

What on earth are the Democrats doing? President Trump has nominated CIA director Mike Pompeo, eminently qualified by any reasonable standard, to be America’s 70th secretary of state. And yet the Senate Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer, have perverted the advice and consent clause of the Constitution into a ... Read More

The Mournful, Magnificent Sally Mann

‘Does the earth remember?" The infinitely gifted photographer Sally Mann asks this question in the catalogue of her great retrospective at the National Gallery in Washington. On view there is her series of Civil War battlefield landscapes, among the most ravishing works of art from the early 2000s. Once sites ... Read More
PC Culture

People Are Losing Their Minds Over Starbucks

We can all easily imagine circumstances in which a manager of a coffee shop or restaurant might properly call the police to ask them to remove loiterers. These are places of business. There’s nothing wrong in principle with calling the cops on non-customers who are taking up space. And there’s nothing wrong ... Read More
PC Culture

The Dark Side of the Starbucks Stand-Down

By now the story is all over America. Earlier this month, two black men entered a Starbucks store in Philadelphia. They were apparently waiting for a friend before ordering — the kind of thing people do every day — and one of the men asked to use the restroom. A Starbucks employee refused, saying the restroom ... Read More

Save the Eighth

There are many things to admire in Ireland’s written constitution. Most especially, the text includes, since a popular referendum in 1983, the Eighth Amendment: “The State acknowledges the right to life of the unborn and, with due regard to the equal right to life of the mother, guarantees in its laws to ... Read More
White House

The Comey & Mueller Show

It has been a good week for President Trump. Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz provided indisputable evidence that former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe lied at least four key times and was fired by the attorney general for cause -- and that Mr. Trump had nothing to do with it. McCabe and ... Read More