In USA Today, First Amendment expert (and Bench Memos contributor) Rick Garnett has an interesting piece addressing how the Supreme Court ought “to bring clarity to its murky doctrines relating to government speech and religious symbols”:
The court should, in a predictable and principled way, enforce the establishment clause by preventing attempts by government to exercise religious authority or to interfere with religious communities’ self-government, and leave the monitoring of monuments to the good sense of citizens and to the give-and-take of ordinary politics.