Bench Memos

Ronald Dworkin

He passed away last week and there has been much discussion about his legacy. A few thoughts: He wanted a law of high “principle,” but he rejected the notion that there are moral truths that could furnish the ground and substance of those principles. He offered, as the ground of jurisprudence, “a nation’s political traditions and culture.” But of course, slavery was quite in accord with the “political traditions and culture” of this country up to the time when it was abolished. And the deeper irony came with all of those new, enlightened “rights” that he would have judges discover. He would invoke all of the claims associated with natural law and moral truths when it came to overriding the judgments of legislators elected by voters. And yet, if the test of the rightness or justice of things was the matter of gauging just who is more closely in accord with the local culture and traditions, elected politicians figured to be far more precise barometers than unelected judges drawn from Harvard and Yale. We had here a shell game, practiced by academic commentators, who were never somehow “called” on the incoherence of what they were doing. And among that group, he was a star, as a practitioner of the art and as a telling example.

Hadley Arkes is the Ney Professor of Jurisprudence Emeritus at Amherst College, the founder of the James Wilson Institute on Natural Rights & the American Founding, and the architect of the Born-Alive Infants Protection Acts.

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More