Bench Memos

Law & the Courts

Misguided ‘Pro-Life’ Attack on Trump Supreme Court Candidate Allison Eid

Five down, one to go. Let’s get to it.

Pro-life activist Andy Schlafly’s entire support for his assertion that Colorado supreme court justice Allison Eid “probably would NOT be pro-life on the Supreme Court” is his assertion that she is

unusually silent on abortion; she tersely dissented from a denial of cert. before the Colorado Sup. Ct. in a challenge to an injunction against abortion protesters, initially on only the limited grounds of the length of the injunction and then later only on free speech grounds.

I confess that I can’t make sense of Schlafly’s complaint, and at this point I’m not inclined to imagine that there might be any there there. I will note that the rulings at issue came in the case of Saint John’s Church in the Wilderness v. Scott, in which a church brought a nuisance action against protesters who demonstrated against abortion and homosexuality in a manner that interfered with church services.

You might think that a pro-life activist would give Eid credit for trying to get her court to review the rulings of the state court of appeals and for dissenting publicly—twice—from its failure to do so. But, no, we’re evidently supposed to imagine that Eid’s dissent should have been more verbose and should have been on some other grounds (grounds that Schlafly won’t clue us in on).

I have no idea what Schlafly’s hyperlink to a U.S. Supreme Court certiorari petition that Eugene Volokh filed is meant to signify.

I will have some closing thoughts on Schlafly’s attacks in what I expect to be my final post in this series.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More