Bench Memos

Sometimes Judges Need Editors

James Taranto of OpinionJournal, in his Best of the Web column today (see the final item) comments on an amusing article that appeared in Legal Times regarding the silent feud that rages beneath the placid surface of the Supreme Court about when to add an “s” after the apostrophe when forming a possessive of a noun that ends in “s.”  I’m with the author, attorney Jonathan Starble: count me in the camp of Justice Souter on this one, not Justice Thomas.

I’ve been editing Supreme Court opinions for years, just for my students (because I can’t stand either the cost or the editing of commercial casebooks), and for most of that time I have been silently correcting the justices who get this wrong.  The late Chief Justice Rehnquist was one of the worst offenders, believing wrongly that the possessive of the proper noun “Congress” takes an apostrophe with no “s” added.

Taranto reports an incoherent Wall Street Journal stylebook rule about whether a syllable is accented or not.  Where that idea came from is anybody’s guess.  If you want an authority, try Strunk and White’s Elements of Style, where this is literally the first rule in the book: “Form the possessive singular of nouns by adding ’s.  Follow this rule whatever the final consonant.”  A very, very few exceptions are admitted.  And the sainted H.W. Fowler concurs, in his 1926 A Dictionary of Modern English Usage (avoid all subsequent editions and “American” usage guides), insisting on the “s” except “[i]n verse, & in poetic or reverential contexts.”

As a teacher, I take a somewhat softer but commonsensical line: if you would say it when speaking, spell it when writing.  Does anyone think that voicing the syllables “Congress” is capable of expressing a possessive sense?  Of course not.  What everyone says is “Congresses,” so we need to add the extra “s” that we utter when speaking.

As Starble’s article makes clear, the trouble on the Supreme Court is that every justice runs a self-governing editor’s shop, the result being nonstandardization.  No one is willing to tell any of the justices that they commit solecisms.  Now there’s a real job for the new chief justice!

Matthew J. Franck — Matthew J. Franck is the Director of the William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution at the Witherspoon Institute in Princeton, New Jersey.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Basta La Vista, Baby

Dear Reader (And especially Martha McSally’s dog), As I often note, I increasingly tend to see the political scene as a scripted reality show in which the writers don’t flesh out the dialogue so much as move characters into weird, wacky, confrontational, or embarrassing positions. It’s a lot like The ... Read More

Betsy DeVos Strikes a Blow for the Constitution

The Department of Education has issued its long-awaited proposed regulations reforming sexual-assault adjudications on college campus. Not only will these rules restore basic due process and fairness to college tribunals, but they also — given how basic the changes are — highlight just how ridiculous ... Read More
Politics & Policy

ABC News Makes a Serious Mistake

Today, across Twitter, I began to see a number of people condemning the Trump administration (and Betsy DeVos, specifically) for imposing a new definition of sexual assault on campus so strict that it would force women to prove that they were so harassed that they'd been chased off campus and couldn't return. ... Read More