Bench Memos

Law & the Courts

Tammy Baldwin’s Phony Process Objection to Seventh Circuit Nominee

Last week, President Trump added to his excellent record of judicial picks by nominating Milwaukee lawyer (and former state judge) Michael B. Brennan to a vacancy on the Seventh Circuit. But Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin is objecting to Brennan’s nomination on the ground that President Trump supposedly “turn[ed] his back on a Wisconsin tradition of having a bipartisan process for nominating judges.”

Baldwin’s objection cannot be taken seriously.

Under the agreement between Baldwin and her Republican colleague Ron Johnson, each senator appoints three members of the six-member judicial nominating commission, and a nominee is deemed approved by the commission only if that nominee gets at least five votes. Brennan received four votes—more, I’m told by folks involved in the process, than any other candidate, including the two Baldwin recommended.

It’s true that Brennan, despite receiving bipartisan support, fell one vote short of the five-vote threshold. But Baldwin herself, just two years ago, sent to President Obama’s White House “the names of all eight applicants” to the commission, including six who had received no more than three or four votes. In defense of her disregard of commission rules, Baldwin’s chief of staff explained, “This appellate court vacancy is now 1,947 days old and Senator Baldwin believes it is important that action be taken to put a judge in place to serve.”

Having invited President Obama to select a nominee who didn’t meet the five-vote threshold, Baldwin can hardly be heard to complain that President Trump has done so. Indeed, she should be grateful that he has selected a candidate who received approval from one of her appointees. The vacancy is now 2,189 days old, so Baldwin’s belief that “it is important that action be taken to put a judge in place” ought to be stronger than ever.

I’m further informed that the White House consulted with Baldwin and interviewed the two candidates she recommended, neither of whom (I’m told) received more than three votes from the commission.

Most Popular


Jussie Smollett Jokes Declared Off-Limits

The Jussie Smollett story has been declared not fit for jokes. "It's a straight-up tragedy," declares the co-creator of a Comedy Central show, South Side, set in Chicago. Bashir Salahuddin, a former Jimmy Fallon writer, says “The whole situation is unfortunate. Particularly for the city, there’s bigger ... Read More

What The 1619 Project Leaves Out

“The goal of The 1619 Project, a major initiative from The New York Times that this issue of the magazine inaugurates, is to reframe American history by considering what it would mean to regard 1619 as our nation’s birth year,” The New York Times Magazine editors declare. “Doing so requires us to place ... Read More
PC Culture

Courage Is the Cure for Political Correctness

This might come as some surprise to observers of our campus culture wars, but there was a time, not long ago, when the situation in American higher education was much worse. There a wave of vicious campus activism aimed at silencing heterodox speakers, and it was typically empowered by a comprehensive regime of ... Read More
Film & TV

The Movies Take On Limbaugh, Levin, et al.

Oh, good, here’s the lefty British comic Steve Coogan to give us his take on American right-wing talk radio. Let’s all settle in for some deep insights. The comedy-drama is dismally titled Hot Air. No, seriously. That’s what they came up with. Coogan’s Lionel Macomb is introduced to us via his ... Read More
White House

Trump’s Ignorant Comments on Israel

Making the click-through worthwhile: figuring out what President Trump meant when he said Jews who vote for Democrats show “either a total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty”; examining the data on how American Jews actually feel about Israel; and why Democrats will always find a way or a reason to avert ... Read More