Bench Memos

Law & the Courts

Tenth Circuit Requires Funding of Planned Parenthood—Part 2

Let’s move past Judge Mary Beck Briscoe’s Huffington Post flacking for Planned Parenthood and turn to the reasoning in her majority opinion.

In order to obtain a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff must establish (among other things) that it is likely to succeed on the merits of its complaint. Briscoe’s majority opinion concludes that PPAU is likely to succeed on its two “unconstitutional conditions” claims—its claims that Utah’s termination of funding improperly penalized its exercise of its (1) First Amendment free-speech and associational rights, and (2) Fourteenth Amendment right to provide abortion services.

The central question, as the majority opinion puts it, is “whether PPAU can establish that [Utah governor] Herbert issued the Directive [to terminate funding] in retaliation for PPAU’s exercise of those rights.” (Slip op. at 31 (emphasis added).) The majority acknowledges that there’s ample evidence on which a jury could find that Herbert did not act in retaliation for PPAU’s exercise of its constitutional rights but instead issued the Directive because he “mistakenly believed that PPAU [as distinct from other Planned Parenthood affiliates] was implicated in the CMP videos and deserved to be punished for its apparent misconduct.” (Pp. 32-33.) But the majority concludes that on the totality of the evidence—including the governor’s participation in a pro-life event—a jury “is more likely than not” to find that Herbert did act “to punish PPAU for [exercise of its] First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.” (P. 35.)

The majority’s reasoning about how a jury would assess the evidence is highly speculative and hardly seems the stuff of which preliminary injunctive relief is made. Can a plaintiff really establish a likelihood of success on the merits when a jury has ample discretion to read the evidence in various ways? And how does the “abuse of discretion” standard of review entitle the Tenth Circuit majority to override the district court’s assessment that the evidence fell short?

The majority’s reasoning about the evidence also makes little sense. PPAU exercised those same First and Fourteenth Amendment rights for the first six years of Herbert’s time as governor, and he never took any action against it. It was only after the CMP videos were released that he canceled the contracts. Further, his contemporaneous statement to the press about the Directive refers specifically to the videos: “[w]e now have video where they’re selling fetus body parts for money and it’s an outrage.” If a court, at the preliminary-injunction stage, has any business concluding that a jury is merely “more likely” to adopt one reading of the evidence rather than another, how is the Tenth Circuit’s judgment about which is “more likely” at all sensible?

Most Popular

Elections

What Do Republican Voters Want?

The latest entry in the post-Trump conservatism sweepstakes was Marco Rubio’s speech at the Catholic University of America in early November. The Florida senator made the case for a “common-good capitalism” that looks on markets in the light of Catholic social thought. “We must remember that our nation ... Read More
Books

The Houellebecqian Moment

We are living in the imagination of Michel Houellebecq. The bête noire of French literature has spent decades deploring the erosion of Western mores that he believes resulted from the sexual revolution of the 1960s. His last novel, Submission, revolved around the election of a theocratic Muslim to the French ... Read More
Culture

‘Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself’

It was just one more segment to fill out the hour, and thereby fill the long 24 hours of Saturday’s cable news on November 2. Or so it seemed. Navy SEAL Mike Ritland was on the Fox News program Watters World to talk to Jesse Watters about trained German shepherds like the one used in the raid that found ... Read More
White House

Impeachment Woes and DACA Throes

This excerpt is from episode 176 of The Editors. Charlie: Yesterday was the day on which the rain stopped and the sun hid behind the clouds and the eyes of the nation turned in unison toward Capitol Hill for the first day of public hearings in the impeachment of Donald Trump. The results of that first day were ... Read More