Bench Memos

Law & the Courts

Today’s Ruling in Lucia v. SEC

In its ruling today in Lucia v. SEC, the Supreme Court held by a vote of 7-2 that an administrative law judge at the Securities and Exchange Commission was not lawfully appointed and therefore had no authority to issue a decision.

There should be a lot of interesting commentary on this ruling. For present purposes, I’ll just present this quick summary.

In her majority opinion joined by the five justices to her right (the Chief, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch), Justice Kagan held that the SEC’s administrative law judges qualify as “Officers” (rather than employees) under the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. In Kagan’s analysis, this conclusion flowed directly from the Court’s 1991 ruling in Freytag v. Commissioner. Under the Appointments Clause (Article II, section 2), Congress may vest the appointment of “inferior Officers” in the “Heads of Departments.” But the SEC as a body did not itself appoint ALJ Cameron Elliot; he was instead appointed by SEC staff members. His appointment was therefore unconstitutional.

In a brief concurring opinion, Justice Thomas (joined by Gorsuch) argued that under the original public meaning of “Officers of the United States,” all federal civil officials “with responsibility for an ongoing statutory duty” are “Officers.”

In his opinion concurring in part in the judgment, Justice Breyer concluded that the appointment of the ALJ violated the Administrative Procedure Act, as the SEC unlawfully delegated its appointment power to its staff. He objected to deciding that ALJs are “Officers” under the Constitution “without first deciding … what effect that holding would have on the statutory ‘for cause’ removal protections that Congress provided for administrative law judges.” In short, if being “Officers” means that they could be fired at will, he would not conclude that they are “Officers.” (Unlike the majority, he also concluded that the same ALJ, upon being properly appointed, could hear the case.)

Foes of the administrative state will be heartened by Breyer’s concern that by considering the “Officers” question separately from the removal question, “the Court risks … unraveling, step-by-step, the foundations of the Federal Government’s administrative adjudication system as it has existed for decades.”

In her dissent, Justice Sotomayor (joined by Ginsburg) opined that only someone with “the ability to make final, binding decisions on behalf of the Government” qualifies as an “Officer” under the Appointments Clause. Perhaps I’m missing it on a quick read, but I don’t see how that test allows for the existence of any inferior officers. I’m also unclear how Sotomayor derives it. (She does present “some historical support for such a requirement,” but that sounds very weak.)

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Ilhan Omar: A Hostage Situation

‘It has to stop,” says Representative Ilhan Omar. No, it does not. Representative Omar, the Jew-hating Minnesota Democrat, is engaged in one of her usual games of misdirection, a pattern of hers that by now is familiar enough to be predicted: She says something outrageously stupid, offensive, ... Read More
Film & TV

Everyone Is Wrong about The Searchers

The greatest Western of all time . . . isn’t. Though The Searchers is regularly hailed as the finest exemplar of its genre and one of the best movies of any kind (seventh-best of all time, according to the decennial Sight & Sound poll), John Ford’s 1956 film is mediocre for most of its run time. Nearly ... Read More

Why ‘Stop Sanders’?

'Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?” T. S. Eliot asked. “Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?” And where is the intelligence we have lost in cleverness? Cleverness is the plague of our political classes, an influenza of the intellect. The consultants are always trying to ... Read More

Trump Is Hell-Bent on ‘Owning the Libs’

President Trump is looking into giving a free trip to San Francisco, New Orleans, or other great American cities to tens of thousands of refugees from Central America. All so he can own the libs. “Owning the libs” is one of those phrases to have emerged over the past few years that vacillates between ... Read More