Bench Memos

This Week at the Supreme Court

The Court is continuing this term’s slower pace of work, with only four hours scheduled for argument this week.

This morning the Court will hold oral argument about the scope of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act in NLRB v. SW General, Inc., which resembles a statutory version of the constitutional question in NLRB v. Noel Canning (2014). The FVRA was passed in 1998 to prevent presidents from circumventing Senate opposition to a particular presidential nominee by hiring the nominee as a high-level assistant and then designating them the “acting” official. In this case, the president designated an acting general counsel under the FVRA but then nominated the same person for the non-acting position, something which arguably made the nominee ineligible to serve as an “acting” official. The interpretive details get somewhat technical, but there are some interesting issues floating around in the case. One is whether Congress acquiesced to a statutory interpretation set out in a 1999 OLC memo that was reversed only two years later.  Another is the extent to which “historical practice” can be helpful to statutory interpretation when the statute itself isn’t even 20 years old. 

On Tuesday the Court will hear a case about the standing requirements for cases brought under the Fair Housing Act and a case about original jurisdiction over cases brought by or against Fannie Mae. On Wednesday the Court will consider the constitutionality of differing physical-presence requirements for citizenship that apply to unwed citizen mothers of foreign-born children and those that apply to other citizen parents of foreign-born children.  

Jonathan Keim — Jonathan Keim is Counsel for the Judicial Crisis Network. A native of Peoria, Illinois, he is a graduate of Georgetown University Law Center and Princeton University, an experienced litigator, and ...

Most Popular

Immigration

The Left, the Wall, the Truth

Democrats and others on the left offer three reasons for their opposition to building a wall on America's southern border. 1. A wall is ineffective. 2. A wall is too expensive. 3. A wall is immoral. Each one is false, so false as to constitute lies. So, the only question is: Do Democrats and others on ... Read More
White House

The FBI Tramples Our Political Order

The FBI took it upon itself to determine whether the president of the United States is a threat to national security. No one had ever before thought that this was an appropriate role for the FBI, a subordinate agency in the executive branch, but Donald Trump isn’t the only one in Washington trampling ... Read More