Bench Memos

Law & the Courts

Who is Kevin Newsom?

Judge Kevin Newsom is one of President Trump’s potential nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Age: 44 (approximate)

Current Position: Circuit Court Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Education:

  • B.A., Samford University (1994), summa cum laude, President’s Cup

  • J.D., Harvard Law School (1997), magna cum laude, Articles Editor, Harvard Law Review

Judicial Clerkships:

  • Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1997-1998)

  • Justice David H. Souter of the U.S. Supreme Court (2000-2001)

Experience:

  • 2001-2003: Associate, Covington & Burling (Washington, DC)

  • 2003-2007: Solicitor General for the State of Alabama (Montgomery, AL)

  • 2007-2017: Partner, Bradley Arant, Boult Cummints, LLP (Birmingham, AL)

  • 2017-present: Circuit Court Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Notable Matters:

  • Mr. Newsom has argued four cases in the U.S. Supreme Court, has filed amicus curiae briefs in more than 20 others, and has authored numerous petitions for certiorari and briefs in opposition to certiorari.

  • Outside the U.S. Supreme Court, Mr. Newsom has argued more than 30 cases in nine different federal appellate circuits as well as in the Alabama Supreme Court and the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

  • In 2011, Chief Justice John G. Roberts appointed Mr. Newsom to the Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules, which studies and advises the Judicial Conference of the United States concerning amendments and improvements to the Federal Rules of Appellate Proceture. Mr. Newsom is one of only three private practitioners on the 10-person committee.

Select Awards: Fellow, American Academy of Appellate Lawyers (since 2016); Chambers USA, Appellate Litigation (since 2015); The Best Lawyers in America (since 2009); American Lawyer Magazine “Fab Fifty: America’s Top 50 Litigators Under Age 45” (2007); Law360 “Rising Star: America’s Top 10 Appellate Lawyers Under Age 40” (2010); Benchmark Litigation, “Litigation Star” (since 2011); Recipient (four-time) National Association of Attorneys General “Best Brief Award, ” given for outstanding briefing in U.S. Supreme Court.

Biographical Notes: Mr. Newsom is married and has two young children.

Carrie Severino is chief counsel and policy director to the Judicial Crisis Network.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More
Books

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More