Bench Memos

Wittes on Partial-Birth Ruling

In this essay (registration required) today on The New Republic Online, Benjamin Wittes offers an analysis of the Court’s ruling in Gonzales v. Carhart that is along the same lines as my NRO essay of a week ago:  namely, that its real significance lies in its treating facial challenges to abortion regulations much more like other facial challenges.  Wittes, who describes himself as “favor[ing] abortion rights,” sensibly welcomes this development:  “it stands to make abortion fights less binary,” and “there is much to be said for the Court’s not throwing out more law than it needs to.”


Contrary to one of the many false assertions in Dorothy Samuels’s confused New York Times essay, Wittes also explains (consistent with my point 7 here) that the Court’s approach “followed the path it sketched out” in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood a year ago. 


Twelve days after the Court’s ruling, Wittes’s piece is the first responsible and intelligent discussion of Gonzales v. Carhart that I’ve seen from someone who opposes the federal partial-birth ban.  (I haven’t been reading everything, though, so perhaps I’ve missed something else.) 

Most Popular


The 2020 Battle Begins

The 2020 campaign begins in earnest next week in Florida, when Donald Trump officially launches his reelection bid. On June 26, 20 Democratic candidates and five moderators hold the first of two nights of debates. Where do things stand? According to the polls, President Trump starts at a disadvantage. He has ... Read More
Energy & Environment

The Climate Trap for Democrats

The more the climate debate changes, the more it stays the same. Polls show that the public is worried about climate change, but that doesn’t mean that it is any more ready to bear any burden or pay any price to combat it. If President Donald Trump claws his way to victory again in Pennsylvania and the ... Read More